That Hotchkiss Engine

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Last month we referred to the vee-twin Hotchkiss engine, in association with some comments about air-cooling. It was an engine destined to give good service in BSA cars made by the great Birmingham Small Arms company, first in the BSA Ten light car which was made from 1921 to 1925, one of which the Threlfalls have campaigned successfully in VSCC events in recent times, and later in the BSA front-drive three-wheelers made from 1929 to 1936 (until a water-cooled four-cylinder was substituted) and also as a four-wheeled edition of the three-wheeler, although the latter must by now be a very rare animal indeed.

As with other armament manufacturers, BSA bad surplus production capacity when there was no major war in progress, and this was turned to making car engines: William Morris was glad to avail himself of the four-cylinder type for his Morris cars. Until, that is, he bought the Hotchkiss company, after which BSA obtained the rights to the, air-cooled vee-twin engine. The earlier engines were made at the Coventry Hotchkiss factory used after Germany had overrun Paris to ensure that munitions would still be available; the company was to a degree British-controlled. It seems that Hotchkiss may have intended to make a light car of its own. The vee-twin engine was tested in an old Morris chassis and tried out, or perhaps demonstrated would be more correct, in the 1921 MCC London-Edinburgh trial, disguised as an “Experimental” and driven by G S Bullock, who gained a silver medal. This may have been when BSA took note, or became more interested in using the Hotchkiss engine. I believe it was somewhat modified for its later adaptation to the Hulse-designed BSA three-wheelers, and made first in the Birmingham works of the Small Arms concern.

This well-made air-cooled vee-twin Hotchkiss engine was certainly well established in the first quarter of 1921. Apart from the award mentioned above, an experimental chassis registered as the “Blank” (HP 1787) had been run for 11,000 miles, and in the course of this testing had appeared in the 1920 MCC land’s End trial, driver AC Hardy, result a gold medal. The design of the engine was simple yet advanced. The cast iron cylinders were angled at 90deg, the bore and stoke being 804 x 85mm (1080cc). This gave a taxable rating of 9,9hp, although the “Experimental” was declared as a 12hp car, presumably as a disguise. The aluminium pistons had H-section conrods with roller-bearing big-ends, and the crankshaft ran on ball bearings. The overhead valves were operated by enclosed push-rods and rockers encased in cast-iron covers, the camshaft being central. Later modifications included a built-up crankshaft, the gear-type oil pump transferred to the bottom of the sump, and the exhaust pipes curved to merge into a single pipe constituting a hot-spot for the inlet manifold.

On the assumption, perhaps, that twin-cylinder engines can be hard to start, the BSA starting handle was geared up 2-to-1 via the distribution gearing, and a half-compression device fitted. In standard guise this little engine produced 17.5bhp at 2500rpm but it could be tuned to give just over 20bhp at 2600rpm by increasing the compression ratio from 4.45:1 to 5.0:1 , and installing a different camshaft. BMEP was notable, being from 93 to 115lb/sq in. With flywheel the engine weighed 190Ib, or 11 lb/hp in tuned form, with the thick cylinder walls and pistons and valve port finning used to ensure efficient cooling under road conditions. I wonder if Tom Threlfall was able to obtain one of the “racing” camshafts? As no doubt was Capt Brittain for his trials BSA which lapped Brooklands at over 63mph. WB