Skip navigation
 
15 February 2010 Formula 1 Sports Cars 4

New Lotus is looking good

The launch of the new Lotus Grand Prix car in London last week got me thinking. At last something has – I haven’t been inspired to put pen to blog in recent weeks.

f1 New Lotus is looking good

Launches of new racing cars fall into two main categories – the absurdly lavish with dry ice, awful music and dancing girls. Or the nicely businesslike (as in Williams every year) where the car is the star and you have a gut feeling about its prospects.

The unveiling of the new Lotus fell into the latter category. Well, OK, it was a little bit glitzy but not absurdly so.

The Lotus-Cosworth T127 is a great-looking racing car, at least as far as is possible in the modern era. And great-looking racing cars are often quick racing cars. Not always, granted, but if they look right, then they invariably are right. Of course, looks are a subjective thing, but I like what Mike Gascoyne has done with his first car for the Malaysian version of the old Team Lotus.

f1 New Lotus is looking good

The colour scheme is terrific – enough green and yellow to acknowledge its heritage without being a ghastly pastiche of the real thing. Clean, simple lines and a purposeful feel about the ‘package’, as it’s known these days. I am a fan of Gascoyne and his work. I’m aware that a great many people find him difficult, rather too bullish, but I find his attitude acceptable in a world that is so often pasteurised, homogenised and corporately correct. I believe, also, that he has built some good cars which, given a bit more development, could have been great. We know that looks are not everything, but somehow the T127 gets off on the right foot even when it’s standing still.

In the highly complex world of aerodynamics and aeronautical engineering that pervades modern Grand Prix racing the tiniest pieces of bodywork can take a car to the front of the grid or leave it languishing at the back. So we will have to wait a couple of months before we know whether Gascoyne has got this one right. The hard work begins now, in Jerez, and the big test will be in Bahrain and beyond. There will be problems, there will be frustrations, but a man of Jarno Trulli’s experience will know, pretty much as soon as he leaves the pitlane, how effective the new Lotus will be.

f1 New Lotus is looking good

One of the most important things a Grand Prix car has to do is combine speed through the air with grip in the corners. That sounds obvious, but it’s a fine balance, a sweet spot that eludes even the best engineers.

In 2006, at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, I remember studying the Renault R26 in which Fernando Alonso had won his second World Championship. Nearby, Dan Gurney was doing a TV interview, during which he observed that – were he a piece of air – then this was the car he’d most like to drive through him. We knew what he meant. Tim Densham’s car looked right straight out of the box and, developed by Densham/Bell and Symonds, it wafted Alonso to a second consecutive title.

Of course, we can also think of great-looking F1 cars that failed to live up to their looks. For various and very different reasons, Dan Gurney’s beautiful Eagle and the gorgeous Brabham BT45 did not translate beauty into winning. There are always exceptions. But consider the cars of Gordon Murray, surely the most visually stunning of the modern era. They looked right, they were right, and they won a great many races. And yes, I know, there were exceptions even then.

I wish Lotus well. We all know it’s not the “real thing” but it’s a good name to have on the grid and my instinct is that it will be the best of the new teams as the season unfolds.

Similar content

MonMS_10

It’s not the first time F1 were ugly

09/02/12

If it looks right, it is right: Renault AK 90CV, Bugatti Type 35, Alfa Romeo Tipo B, Maserati 250F, Lotus …

38DON02

The return of the Silver Arrows

08/02/12

Something quite extraordinary has been announced. An event that no motor racing enthusiast can afford to miss, that nobody ever …

L_036435

Why we’ll miss Patrick Head in Formula 1

25/01/12

Never exactly one to kowtow to convention, Patrick Head. But then great race engineers never are. It’s written in their …

Author

2011_Rob-Widdows

Rob Widdows

Read Rob's profile and more …

4 comments on New Lotus is looking good

  1. Stuart Booth, 16 February 2010 12:44

    As both a retired engineer and now a motorsport artist I was interested in your comments about the look of the new Lotus. I agree that the Lotus certainly looks the part but the adage about what looked right was right doesn’t seem to apply anymore. This year’s crop seems to include some of the ugliest grand prix cars ever with the pacesetting McLaren being probably the worst with that hideous fin/cooling duct and those long downward sloping sidepods. The driving force for the bodywork designs seems to be to maximise the airflow to the dreaded double diffusers.

    Whilst I was really pleased to watch Brawn’s success last year I can’t understand how the double diffusers, whilst being legal to the letter of the regs, are allowed to continue when they are clearly against the spirit, which was intended to restrict downforce and improve the ability of cars to follow each other more closely and hopefully increase overtaking.

    I also thought that the regs were meant to mean a return to much cleaner bodywork but there seems to be gradually increase in the number and size of barge boards, turning vanes etc. And as for those hideous masts which have sprouted on top of air boxes – where did they come from? – are they related to the new gps requirement? – does anyone know?

  2. rob widdows, 17 February 2010 11:59

    Thanks for taking the time to make some interesting observations – and yes, I would agree that the modern cars are ugly. Worse still, they all look and sound pretty much the same. Which is why I did like the look of the T127, in that it has begun its life as a nice looking car. How it will look in six moths time is another matter. I am not an engineer – I just think it looks clean, simple and purposeful!
    I think the “masts” are there for testing and hopefully they will be gone, or reduced, once racing begins. At this time of the year the cars are festooned with bits and pieces of communications equipment as they digest the pressures, temperatures, aero forces and other such information.
    As to the rules I sometimes think the engineers are so much brighter than the rule-makers, leading us back to the same point however many times the regs are changed. I’m not sure they are too concerned about the ‘spirit’, just the loopholes!
    There won’t be a sudden rush of overtaking as long as we have the circuits we have and the areodynamics we have, it seems to me. And those brakes….. utterly extraordinary stopping power.
    Despite all this, I foresee a very competitive year ahead. A crop of unusually talented drivers, and an increasingly tight battle at the end of last year, both augur well. Time will tell.
    RW

  3. N.Weingart, 18 February 2010 18:51

    As to beauty; the cars reflect the technical restraints imposed by the team’s engineering staffs whch increasingly dictate the technical regulations of F1. Teams bloated by huge aero departments obsessed with downforce. This obsession required such a huge investment that it has marginalized engine developement and stifled innovative design in any other aspect of vehicle performance. It’s an ugly formula which grows more out-of-step with real world relevance each season. Is using massive amounts of power to attain higher average velocities of compromised chassis through curves reallty the end-all, be-all of vehicle dynamics?

  4. N.Weingart, 18 February 2010 18:54

    Sorry, that last line should read:
    curves really be the end-all, be-all of vehicle dynamics?

Add your comments