Matters of moment, December 1995

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Attention to detail

For a few hours on Friday November 10, motor racing was feeling distinctly uneasy once again. Mika Hakkinen’s accident during qualifying for the Australian Grand Prix highlighted the fact that no matter how much safer racing cars are supposed to have become in the wake of 1994’s tragedies, there are some things against which one cannot legislate. Simply, one should never overlook the fact even if the cars were to be rendered indestructible, you could never do the same for the human beings they carry.

Fortunately, prompt and efficient medical attention saved Mika Hakkinen’s life, and the signs are that he will make a full recovery. That notwithstanding, the incident has given the FIA and the GPDA furtherfood for thought.

Long before Hakkinen’s accident, there had been talk of introducing airbags to Formula One cars, which seems eminently sensible.

It seems strange that a sport which can sometimes operate with such foresight could have allowed the Australian Grand Prix meeting to kick off when a concrete wall on the exit of a fast right-hander was protected only by a single layer of tyres, about which nothing was done until it was almost too late.

It is all very well Formula One taking great strides forward when it comes to the technology of safety, but it strikes us that a little more attention to detail in more basic areas would not be misplaced.

Double standards?

The expulsion of Toyota Team Europefrom the World Rally Championship is the first evidence we have seen of the FIA taking draconian measures against those found to be transgressing the rules of the sport.

Whilst in no way condoning the actions of those at Toyota who were responsible for the illegal, power-boosting device on the rallying Celicas, we find it anomalous to say the least that certain of the infringements uncovered in Formula One last year were punished by fines which, bearing in mind the budgets of those concerned, were frankly risible. Explanations on a postcard please…