Racing lines: February 2018

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Should recently built ‘classic’ cars be permitted to race at historic events? Join us for a stroll through a well-trodden minefield…

In the often snooty world of classic cars it’s almost compulsory to look down upon kit cars and replicas. It’s ironic, then, that historic racing –arguably the pinnacle of the classic car scene – should be packed with cars that aren’t what they seem. There are no Nissan 350Zs masquerading as Ferrari 250 GTOs, but rare is the grid that doesn’t feature an apparently old racing car that’s probably seen fewer Christmases than your socks.

Copy. Clone. Continuation. Evocation. Replica. Call ’em what you will. New cars built precisely to blueprints of the originals are a fact of life in historic motor sport. Whether they’re a good or bad thing is one of the more complex and emotive issues facing all of us.

Some series organisers have a policy of not accepting copies or continuations. But as with most rules, there are always one or two exceptions that undermine the zero tolerance approach. Other organisers make no distinction between genuine cars that were built and raced in period and authentic cars that have been built in recent years. When your business is filling grids there’s no right or wrong answer.

The only thing not at the organisers’ discretion is the need for an all-important FIA Historic Technical Passport (HTP), which is a requirement for any car competing in international historic motorsport. It’s a common misconception that HTPs somehow authenticate a car’s provenance, for they do no such thing. As the UK Motor Sport Association (MSA) explains: “The HTP is essentially a sporting document and says nothing about the authenticity, provenance, origins, etc, of a car. It is concerned only that the car’s specification is that of the particular model it purports to be. The whole purpose of the HTP is to try to ensure that cars accord with the authentic specification and can therefore compete with one another fairly.

“Whether the car is wholly original, partly original, assembled wholly or partly out of period components or a copy built recently is not relevant to an HTP. The prime criterion is that the car represents a provable specification that competed internationally in period.”

So the technical specification of new and original cars ensures they should perform equally, but does that make the playing field level? I’m not sure it can entirely, at least if you’re one of the few racing a genuine period car with significant history against someone in a car with equal performance but worth a fraction of the money. That said, the jeopardy works both ways. Nobody wants to be the one who crashes, or crashes into, some priceless piece of history. Ultimately this just underlines my belief that historic racing should place emphasis on having the right attitude above simply having the ‘right’ car.

Adding to the conundrum are the number, variety and pedigree of the new-built cars. In the mid ’90s the late John Willment enlisted the help of GT40 expert Bryan Wingfield to build the final three officially sanctioned GT40s, using original parts and chassis numbers. Real cars, then, just not built in period. Since then companies like Gelscoe and Kirkham have been building beautiful, FIA-compliant GT40s and Cobras from all-new parts. You will unquestionably have seen them race, wittingly or otherwise.

Lola famously built two runs of T70 Mk3B continuation cars – the first in the late ’90s, the second in the mid ’00s. Since then, a few years before his death, the late Eric Broadley gave his blessing to Broadley Automotive, a firm building perfect copies of the Mk3B Lola T70 at premises located a few miles from Lola’s old Huntingdon HQ. Price? About £350,000 – half the cost of a Mk3B with patchy history, or roughly a quarter of the value of the best original cars.

Another celebrated modern continuation project is by Jaguar Heritage – six FIA-approved £1.2m Lightweight E-types, which have been given the last remaining chassis numbers that were originally allocated – but never built – in period. And so it goes on: Lister building a fresh batch of knobbly-bodied Lister-Jaguars; Aston Martin a run of 25 track-only DB4 GTs. The common theme? All cost big money, but still a fraction of the value of an original car.

Perhaps the biggest source of conflict and contradiction are the toolroom copies fielded by those who also own genuine cars. Not all do it, but there’s a tacit acknowledgement that having the real car gives you the right to build and race a clone. Do I blame the owners for doing so? No. Does it diminish our enjoyment of the racing? I don’t believe so, though if we all knew precisely which cars were originals and which were copies it might erode the sense of significance.

Now imagine being the organiser trying to tread that delicate line between upholding standards and filling your grids. Of course due deference should be shown to the owners of the original cars, but to be honest if they happen to be racing a clone what’s the difference between them and those racing continuations? You could turn the whole thing on its head and say it’s wrong for a clone to continue accruing history for a car that retired years ago. Like I said, it’s tricky.

Personally I think so long as the significant original cars get priority if grids are oversubscribed, then where’s the issue in letting the other cars race? It’s short-sighted (selfish, almost) to think historic racing can exist in its present form without the replicas and continuations. Just as it’s unrealistic to believe historically significant period-built cars that have been actively and competitively raced for many years can possibly be completely original.

Is it time historic racing grasped the nettle and openly conceded the sport is about cars like those that raced in period as well as those that did race in period? Surely better to do this than enforce unfair and inconsistent policies on the paddock, then expect that same group to maintain the pretence with a conspiratorial wink? Answers on a postcard, please.

Dickie Meaden has been writing about cars for 25 years – and racing them for almost as long. He is a regular winner at historic meetings