COMMENTS

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Sir,

I cannot refrain from comment on the inaccurate assertions of your correspondent “Two-Point-Six.” If I remember aright, Mr. Sutherland, of Aston-Martin’s, tested and proved correct the rev.-counter alone from Mr. Thursby-Pelharn’s T-type M.G. Midget, and the latter gentleman stated that his speedometer and rev.counter agreed exactly. It was left to another correspondent to point out that the rev.-counter on the T-type M.G. does not record the speed of the engine, but that of the dynamo, which on that model is driven at 1.13 times engine speed, and that therefore both the instruments must be reading 13 per cent. fast. This brings the claimed 96 m.p.h. down to approximately 84; the latter is not impossible, but the former definitely is. I am, Yours, etc.,

Leicester. J. A. COOPER.

Related articles

Related products