Matters of moment, April 1995

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

A false dawn?

Last month, our editorial touched upon Max Mosley’s optimism that Formula One would be free of the odious controversies which marred much of 1994. Sad, then, that at the time of writing, with only a dozen days to go before the start of the Grand Prix season, only a fistful of racing drivers were actually eligible to race at Interlagos on March 26.

Sensibly, the FIA and the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association are trying to play down the Superlicence question. Mosley refuses to make any comment at all, while the drivers themselves are playing their cards close to their chests.

They will say, simply, that they are unhappy with the way certain sections of the Superlicence application form are worded, and that they haven’t signed it as a consequence. Yet, in the next breath, they breeze away suggestions that there is a risk of a strike in the manner of that which occurred at Kyalami in 1982.

It will, they insist, be sorted out.

However, if the problem hadn’t been resolved as most teams were preparing to catch their flights to Brazil, and it hadn’t, then it is unrealistic to think that there won’t be a sour taste in the mouth of one organisation or the other by the time they arrive.

And that is no way to start the year.

Unpalatable as it may seem to the FIA, it is going to have to accept that the GPDA, in its current form, is here to stay. The events of 1994 may have been discordant, and at times downright tragic, but they served to strengthen the drivers’ resolve. And the FIA needs to be aware of as much.

We’re not suggesting that the drivers have it all their own way. We are, however, suggesting that the FIA adopts a flexible stance. Asked what the FIA’s response to the drivers’ initial objections had been, one leading runner replied, “not encouraging”.

And at a time when the sport is in desperate need of restoring its credibility, that in itself is the last thing we need to hear at the dawn of a new Grand Prix season.

You may also like

Related products