Why is Prost unappreciated?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Sir,

Thank you for your Prost on Senna article (March) which I read with considerable interest as these two protagonists raced together in what I personally consider to be a true golden age of Formula 1. I feel they stood head and shoulders above the rest, but what is disappointing is the subsequent historical deification of one and the routine character assassination of the other.

If you had taken a poll among your readers in, say, 1990, you could expect to see Prost and Senna in the top two positions. If you took a poll now I’d bet my house you would have an order of one, M Schumacher; two, Senna – and the chances are Prost wouldn’t even figure.

It seems to me a common distortion of the history of our sport that past champions are seen as just that. Sadly we are already in a period where few saw Fangio or Ascari race, and we are rapidly moving into a situation where the exploits of the likes of Hill, Brabham, Clark and even Stewart are considered as mere footnotes to people whose memories start with Mansell mania and end with Schumacher’s retirement. Even Gilles Villeneuve is becoming a distant memory in an era obsessed with victory tallies.

To lose perspective is to distort history. The facts are simple: without Senna, Prost would have completely dominated F1 and vice-versa. They dominated their team-mates, who included five GP winners.

It is startling that they were even prepared to tolerate such talent in the other car, and this for me is why despite 90-odd wins and seven titles, I can never consider Schumacher the great driver he is thought to be. His refusal to countenance racing even inferior team-mates on equal terms is anathema to being a champion.

Senna did learn from Prost how to manage a race: look at the way he won particularly from 1991 onwards. As with Prost in 1986, ’87 and ’90, he didn’t always have the best car, but used what he had better than his rivals.

Ultimately for some observers what might tarnish a view of racing drivers is the manner in which they drive – Prost was probably the smoothest driver of all, and possibly the best manager of a race or season. Stewart and Clark would be his competition, but perhaps they weren’t exciting enough to watch.

Prost was correct in your interview: in death Senna achieved far more than any rival could possibly do in life, but to effectively deny that anybody else competed is ridiculous. Over two years together Prost certainly outscored his rival (without the best 11 scores rule) and perhaps became the only man in equal machinery to outrace Senna. That is something he should be extremely proud of, and we should feel privileged to have witnessed.

Ian Brooks, Whinmoor, Leeds