Andrew Frankel

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Road cars
Toyota’s sticky situation

I’m not sure I’ve known the motor industry in more volatile mood. Who would have thought two years ago that Porsche would lose its independence to become just another outpost of the VW empire, that Chrysler would be run by Fiat, that Ford would be in profit, or that the once unstoppable Toyota juggernaut would have tripped over its own pedals and started tumbling towards who knows what fate? Even if the sale of Saab could have been predicted, few would have betted on Spyker becoming its new proprietor. That is one story that will run and run. There are uncomfortable parallels with the last days of Rover, and all we can hope is that Spyker knows where to find the investment required to rebuild a brand that’s been run into the ground over a 20-year period by what was the world’s largest car company.

But it is the precarious position of the current holder of that title, Toyota, that interests me most. This once most assured of companies has become accident-prone, a dangerous affliction in this cut-throat world. First there was a major recall in the US over mis-fitted carpets, one or more of which may have cost lives. Then there was the worldwide recall of a wide range of Toyota products to fix accelerator pedals that, under certain specific circumstances, might become sticky or even stick open. Finally, there have been reports of inconsistent brake feel on the new Prius. As I write Toyota is in the process of recalling eight million cars from around the world; as you read the figure may be considerably higher.

Has Toyota started making dangerous cars? If you listened to the hysteria emanating from, in particular, the US, you would be forgiven for thinking so. Then again, the cynic in me finds it hard to ignore that the fall of the US auto industry was precipitated by the rise of its Japanese equivalent. And as by far its biggest player and the car company that overtook GM in 2008 as the world’s largest, if Toyota provided enough rope, I can’t see the still powerful US auto lobby wasting much time assembling the gallows.

Toyota has been unlucky, too, in its timing. As the pointless pandemonium caused by SARS, BSE and swine flu have shown we like a good scare, and with only the same old stories emanating from Iraq, Afghanistan and Copenhagen, the world was ripe and ready for something new with which to indulge its neuroses.

So perhaps a sense of perspective is required. On the entire continent of Europe not a single accident, let alone an injury, has yet been attributed to the accelerator issue. The carpet problem was confined within the US and the Prius brake issue in no way affects the car’s ability to slow down, merely the feel of the pedal. If you press it hard enough, the car will stop in the usual way.

Nevertheless, this is serious, as anyone working at Audi in the US in the mid-80s will attest. Then it was alleged that the new Audi 5000 would run amok without warning, rendering its hapless occupants victims of ‘unintended acceleration’. In due course, it turned out that in fact owners were treading on the wrong pedal. But it didn’t stop Audi sales being decimated, even after it was exonerated. The recovery was measurable in decades.

I’m not saying Toyota is entirely innocent in this: clearly even the potential for the throttle to jam open is a serious fault in need of immediate attention. But the public fear that’s been whipped up by the associated media storm is entirely out of proportion. I also think there’s an educational shortfall here: I doubt there is a single driver reading this magazine who would not first feel a change in throttle response – it doesn’t just jam without notice but becomes progressively more sticky – and then if it did stick open wouldn’t know either to dip the clutch or shift into neutral.

Toyota can be criticised for many things, not least its decision to cull all the sporting cars from its ranges, but would I advise anyone otherwise inclined to buy a Toyota to keep away because their prospective purchase might be unsafe? The very thought is nothing less than absurd.