Letters, April 2019

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

Current page

199

Current page

200

Current page

201

Current page

202

Current page

203

Current page

204

Letters

In light of Doug Nye’s recent insightful piece on Historic motor sport and the letters from Duncan Wiltshire and Mark Taylor it seems to me we are approaching a watershed. Duncan’s focus on organisers’ responsibilities has merit but in my experience more must be done to claw back some of the excesses in performance and driver standards. Event organisers and promoters are simply not the parties to police what has become a significantly profitable form of entertainment, complicated by the speed differential inherent in grids where skill levels are wide. When I began racing some 30 years ago I recall Nick Mason making the point that historic racing should be entirely about the cars, not whether a professional BTCC driver can produce faster lap times than in period. Most experienced historic club racers can pedal their cars extremely well. But I’m simply not interested in a Goodwood, Monaco or Silverstone grid where I get to race against a former F1 legend or last year’s F3 champion, not to mention the risks with someone inexperienced in 1960s cars.

While I agree with Messrs Wiltshire and Taylor that going back to ‘flat cap’ days gone by is unrealistic, some further regulation through the FIA and/or MSA surely makes sense to ensure that it’s the cars that matter and that what transpires on the track is fair, consistent with history and doesn’t crowd out those of us who have largely ensured the continuation of this ‘amazing movement’ and that we all, competitors, owners and collectors, fans and loyal spectators alike, have come to enjoy.

Peter Fenichel, Director, VCM Motorsport


Hawthorn (right, speaking to Phil Hill) was always happy to talk to his fans – especially over a pint!

Your recent article on Mike Hawthorn brought back many memories. My old business partner Dudley Gahagan (ex-Dobson ERA R7B etc) knew him very well as his Farnham garage was nearby. Dudley occasionally was given a lift by Mike and was infuriated by his habit of driving very slowly when he had his mates on board who might have egged him on or criticised his driving.

A retired friend of mine was working on the outskirts of Farnham the day of Mike’s crash and remembers the exhaust noise of his Jaguar and Rob Walker’s Mercedes 300SL resonating very loudly in the workshop. Everyone rushed outside to see what was making that noise. It gradually receded into the distance and they all went back to work. Much later the dreadful news of Mike’s death came through on the radio. As one of Farnham’s most famous sons, Mike’s loss was a great shock to all.

Andy Child, Aldershot


I got leave from National Service to go to the 1958 British Grand Prix at Silverstone and whilst in the paddock after practice we enjoyed a pint with Mike Hawthorn. The bar was a khaki marquee and parked alongside was our Ferrari driver’s dark-green Jaguar XK120. Mike referred to all the drivers by their surnames, including ‘mon ami mate’ Collins, but the man on pole was called Stirling.

I shall never forget sitting behind the wheel of an Army Leyland Hippo in Germany when I heard the tragic news of Mike Hawthorn’s accident. The end of the original 1958 Works Team!

Don Weller, Harpenden, Hertfordshire


Your January, 2019 issue implies the Interscope Kremer K4 was actually raced by Interscope in the 1982 IMSA season. I was a member of the 1982-83 Interscope IMSA crew and I can tell you that the Kremer K4 was never raced by Ted Field or Danny Ongais. The list of “challenges” we had to overcome just to get the car to make a complete lap was excessive. The K4 suffered from two problems: 1. Very poor design. 2. Even poorer fabrication and assembly! After a week of work on the car it was decided to put it back in the truck as it never turned a competitive lap and was unreliable. Instead we raced the Lola T600 GTP car and the Kremer K3 we had raced at Sebring.

John Fitzpatrick did successfully race his Kremer K4-01 but only after a complete redesign and rebuild by Glen Blakely. The K4- 02 as received by Interscope in 1982 was not a race-ready car. It was a very easy decision to go with the Lola.

Rex Schimmer, Fulton, California


Last month’s magazine is more akin to the Motor Sport which I used to look forward to every month. I for one commend you on the changes. One could sense that the “blood” was again coursing through the veins of this issue.

Merrick Marshall, via email


have read that you have been congratulated on the new look of Motor Sport from a number of people and I would like to redress the balance and say that I am not very impressed. Do not be surprised if you lose some customers as a result of the direction the magazine is going.

James Thacker


Remembering too well the dark days of the “red cover” I approached my letter box with some trepidation.

Well done. You have provided a good update, with one exception. The cartoon representations are to me out of place, but they did at least reveal that Chris Evans has taken over as editor!

Bruce Grant-Braham, Wimborne, Dorset

I’ll take that as a compliment! Thank you to all readers who have written with their overwhelmingly positive thoughts on the new look. Ed


Contact us
Write to, Motor Sport, 18-20 Rosemont Road, London NW3 6NE or e-mail, [email protected]

You may also like

Related products