The Speed of Sports Cars

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Sir,

In the January 1962 issue of MOTOR SPORT you reviewed “The History of the World’s Sports-Cars,” by Richard Hough. It has since been my pleasure to read this fine book, one of the most interesting parts of which is the “potted specification” section. Here Mr. Hough not only gives indisputable data such as wheelbase, cylinder dimensions, etc., but also the top speed and other performance figures for some cars. Truly he sticks his neck out, even though he covers himself by saving,’ “Performance figures … have been compiled from contemporary road-test figures . . . and are usually the means of several figures available.”

Some surprising comparisons can be made, for instance, the top-speeds quoted for some models are given below :-

Whilst agreeing that top speed is not the sole criterion by which one judges a sports car, the above are sports cars, and all have, to some degree, the characteristics which give sporty motoring. It is surprising, therefore, to see that the car boasting the highest top-speed in the above list is the little J2 M.G. Not only is it faster than some of its larger contemporaries, but also it is faster than some much more recent cars. J2 owners must be bucked to think that their under £100 car is basically faster than, say, Riley Imps and M.P.H.s, for which one might have to pay anything between £300 And £400. Another seemingly strange comparison is :-

Clearly power did not grow on trees in the ‘thirties as it seems to do for some of the tuning shops today.

Also, the quoted power of the 1949 747-c.c. Crosley Hotshot is 26 b.h.p. at 6,500 r.p.m. Bearing in mind the speed which some of these little cars could attain and the fact that M.G. obtained 44 b.h.p. from an unblown 750 in 1932, this really does not seem to be very much.

But to return to the main theme of this letter, did any readers own a J2 M.G. When new ? If so, did it really do an honest 83 m.p.h. ? And why is it that something like a Riley Imp., which is not really any better than the J2, sells for three or four times the price ? Is it simply because one is classified by the V.S.C.C. as a p.v.t., and therefore has snob value ? Or is it ? And why does one qualify as a p.v.t., and not the other ?

M. B. HAWKE.

Bath.