Mintext testing ground

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

That the co-efficient of concordance amongst twelve motoring journalists trying to discover, through self-applied tests, the pads most suitable for the B.M.C. ADO16 series, should be compared to “six blindfolded women testing for best bitter” gives some idea of the divergence of opinions recorded.

The tests, which were carried out at the new Mintex proving ground at Sherborn-in-Elmet, Yorkshire, were to find the pad liner selected by both Lockheed and B.M.C. as most suitable for their range of family cars. Other than the correct pad liner, five other compounds were used on other pads, these being a selection of the many compounds tested over some months before final selection was made.

The test facilities consisted of a circuit of two straights of 900 yards connected by a loop at either end. A 2,200-yard straight for high-speed runs, and a water pit for wet recovery and rapid cooling of discs for cold braking. Tests carried out were left to the various pairs of drivers to devise for themselves, and to get consistent results the same sequence of tests were carried out on each run.

Six ADO16 variants were lined up, lettered A to F. Each had been fitted with different bedded-in front pads, while all rear drums were the same. After each half-hour’s tests, pads were changed so each test started with pads which had been bedded to the same degree.

A quick run through the various test results show A to have a poor co-efficient of friction when cold, building up to good as the discs got warm and beginning to fade when hot. The wet recovery was good. B’s co-efficient of friction was very good when cold but decreased slightly when hot. Wet recovery was fair. C was poor, improving slightly as it heated up. Its wet recovery was medium, but it caused the car to swerve on braking, and didn’t feel good at all. D was good when cold, but faded badly when hot. Wet recovery was poor, and was only of any use when quite cold. E was very poor when cold, snatching and jerky; it improved a little as it warmed up, but was on the whole very unsatisfactory. F was very even both when hot or cold. Its retardation not quite as good as the best results on B, but there was virtually no fade. Wet recovery was good, and high-speed braking even. This latter one we chose as the most suitable for use on ADO16’s and our results, fortunately, were the only ones to coincide with Mintex’s own tests. The morning’s testing was interesting and gave a very good idea of the differences of various pads on the same cars, also the thoroughness with which accessory manufacturers test their products.—M. J. T.

You may also like

Related products