"Both out of their tiny minds..."

Author

admin

View profile
Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

“Both out of their tiny minds…”

The recent Law Courts spat between Group Lotus and Tony Fernandes’s current Lotus Racing operation has been covered very extensively in the specialist media. I was called by Group’s legal team as an allegedly ‘expert’ witness, partly because I have been around for quite a long time, I knew Colin Chapman and Fred Bushell and other principals in the story’s past, and I have also produced some books on Lotus and on Team Lotus in particular. Generally I and the other journalists recruited as witnesses David Tremayne and Karl Ludvigsen for Fernandes while John Blunsden joined me for Group seemed to be confronted

by one basic question.

It was characterised to me as, “In period, did the general public perceive Team Lotus as an individual brand, separate from the brand of Lotus Cars, or were they the same?” Well, the answer seemed to me to be a no-brainer. While Formula 1 insiders and dedicated motor racing fans would quite probably have known that Team Lotus was actually an independent Chapman family company separate from the production car entity, Lotus road cars were certainly sold as much on Team’s racing achievements as on their own attributes. And back in the 1950s or ’60s, if my Mum or Dad had been winged by a badly driven Lotus 7 or Elan, they might pick themselves up, glance aggrievedly

at that circular badge on its nose, read ‘Lotus’ and think “Aaargh those mad racing car people again!” I am confident that historically the general public did not differentiate between the two Lotus entities. Anyway, the hours spent in the witness box at the Royal Courts of Justice might as well have been spent out in the sun threading daisy chains for

all it really achieved. In his written judgement Sir Peter Smith I freely admit with some justification declared: “I did not find the gathered clan of journalists’ and authors’ evidence of much use (because) it is impossible to sift out in any relevant way fact, opinion and even urban myth in relation to such a legendary figure as Colin Chapman”. But as far as I am concerned, much less justified are the glaring factual errors in his written judgement, errors which have left several Team

Lotus old boys and myself less than impressed. Perhaps it’s understandable that Sir Peter should be unequipped to differentiate between mudplugging trials in which one merely attempted to get furthest up a hill and racing when he stated that “Mr Chapman started racing cars in 1947. He built cars for Trials initially” but when he continued “They were mostly single-seat racing cars” then something has surely gone very seriously adrift The judgement then relates how the Lotus Type 14 “…was the first on-road two-seater sports car and was sold under the name Elite” which is only partially true since many of the earlier open cars from Mark VI to Type 11 had been freely used as road-going two-seat sports cars. But what really lights a fuse is the line: “In 1961 Colin Chapman entered Formula 1 for the first time”. One of Team’s old hands has been spitting blood over this, since Team Lotus first entered Formula 1 in the May Silverstone meeting of 1958, three full seasons previously. This kind of stuff hardly fills one with confidence, and all could have been correct had he only digested the written witness statements, which on this evidence he plainly had not. I do, however stoutly support Sir Peter’s pay-off observation in which he writes: “It is unfortunate in my view that this case came before the courts and was incapable of resolution beforehand… At the end of the day I cannot help feeling that nevertheless the parties are better competing against each other on the Fl race track. Equally I cannot help avoiding the feeling that Fl followers would actually find that enhances Fl and they would be interested to see which of the two Lotus cars was more successful and which then might possibly be better placed to claim to be successors to the

Colin Chapman mantle”.

Which could be a polite version of my response to him when he asked my opinion of the case in progress and the two parties involved. It was a straight question, so after some thought I gave a straight answer: “Personally, my Lord, I think they are both out of their tiny minds.” The 40-odd people in court, nearly all of us earning from one party or the other, almost applauded…

Related articles

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore

Related products

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore