Castrol replies to critics

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Sir,

Dear, oh dear! I write a letter presenting, so I thought, a reasonably objective and balanced expression of my company’s views on the subject of long-life oils, and I find myself accused by Mr. Tyssen-Heape of “beating a shining breastplate of self-righteousness.” He really cannot be allowed to get away with this!

May I make it clear straight away that Castrol have not “launched” an oil of this type in Norway. The truth is that a total of 240 quart tins of a grade known as Castrolite E.D.I. was shipped to that country, some six months ago, made to a particular specification requested by one of our distributors there. There has been no publicity for this grade, nor will there be, and we have not claimed, nor will we claim, that this oil may be used for longer than the period specified by any car maker.

Mr. Tyssen-Heape asks what we would expect from an oil marked E.D.I. The initials originate from the United States where they are commonly used and, as he rightly says, stand for “Extended Drain Interval”—extended, that is, on the car makers’ recommendations from every 1,000 or 2,000 miles to today’s 5,000 or 6,000 miles. Castrolite and Castrol XL in the U.K. are already E.D.I. oils in this universally accepted sense. So far as we know, no company in America claims for its E.D.I. oil that it may be used for longer than any car maker recommends.

Mr. Tyssen-Heape also suggests that Castrolite is not a “normal multi-grade oil.” Surely he must be aware that the S.A.E. definition of multigrade specifically includes oils within the 20W/30 group? 20W/30 is a sufficiently wide range to cope satisfactorily with the climatic conditions in this country. At the risk of being accused of re-assuming my breastplate of self-righteousness, dare I observe that we do not believe in asking the motorists to pay for something he does not need? As to the current trend to lubrication servicing every 30,000 miles; yes, we had noticed this. But this refers neither to oil changing nor to several other routine attentions which every car maker specifies at far more frequent intervals.

It would be quite impossible to deal adequately here with the subject of test data. It must suffice to say that any suggestion that information regarding Castrol is not available is quite untrue. Over the years, we have published a mass of technical data covering tests of every kind.

Finally, may I address a brief word to another of your correspondents, Mr. O. L. Uren, although I do not believe he really intends to change his brand of oil because of what I said. The phrase I used was “lubrication procedures” which was intended to refer, perhaps rather pompously, to the frequency of sump draining—not the choice of oil. Rootes do recommend one brand only, in this they are unique among British car manufacturers, but they approve the use of other reputable makes, including Castrol. Your Rapier is quite safe, Mr. Uren!

Laurence Sultan,
Group Public Relations Officer,
Castrol Limited.
London, N.W.1.

Related articles

Related products