A Lotus Blossoms

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

The word “historic” is bandied about pretty freely by the used car trade and the world of auctioneering, and is usually attributed to anything that is obsolete. It can be one year obsolete or 100 years obsolete, the whole question depending on the person trying to get rid of something and the person attracted into acquiring something.

At the recent Motorfair (a very appropriate name for the “goings on” at Earls Court) there was something of a stir in the ranks of Historic (!) Lotus owners over a sports/racer Lotus which was auctioned by Christies, and which someone bought for £27,000. It started with an article in the Daily Express by David Benson, in which this Lotus sports/racer was said to have been “completely restored to its original condition“.

Now, the “historic” aspect of this car was that it was not delivered to the man who ordered it, for the simple reason that he was killed before this Lotus arrived! Even if he had not been killed he would only have recieved a partly-completed Lotus; he intended to have an American engine fitted, so had ordered it without an engine.

Come the auction at Motorfair the catalogue “blurb” written by Christies to attract likely bidders was a riot of fun. It spent a lot of time telling you about this American man who never took delivery of this incomplete Lotus, and about the people who completed it and those who raced it in America.

The important aspect seemed to be its “historic” connections with the original man who never took delivery, or even set eyes on the car. He was a film star by the name of James Dean (and one of my older friends asked: “Who’s James Dean?”).

The “blurb” then got its knickers in a twist and kept on about a Lotus XIII when it meant Lotus VIII and then got muddled up between Lotus VIII and IX. Had Colin Chapman stuck to English numbers life would have been a lot easier. What Christies said was that the car was a Mark 13 when it meant a Mark 8, and then got muddled between Mark 8 and Mark 9 Lotus cars.

The derelict remains which returned from the USA to re-appear as a sparkling and pristine car at Motorfair were described as arriving in “tired but restorable condition”. The chassis frame was too “tired” to restore, as was the bodywork, so they were both replaced by new components — not unused stock from the Lotus factory, mark you.

Some of the bits and pieces from the derelict remains were transferred to the new chassis, but the thing that has upset the Historic Lotus people is that the end result is a Mark 9 chassis, whereas the original was a Mark 8, and the car that was auctioned bore little resemblance to the car that left the Lotus factory in 1955, and even that original car was a bit dubious.

They were early Lotus days before design and production really got into step, so the incomplete car that was sent to America in 1955 was something of a mish-mash. The chassis frame was Mark 8, the suspension and running gear was Mark 9, and the bodywork was Mark 10. “Experimental days” Colin Chapman would have called these.

What has been created today, by people totally unconnected with the Lotus factory, is a very nice copy of a Mark 9 Lotus sports/racer and what someone has bought is a brand new period-piece, of little or no significance; a nice toy nonetheless, but “historic”? Hmm!

For many years now Historics have been Hysterical, and now Colin Chapman’s homemade specials have joined the ranks. I really must dig out that old Formula One car that I have in the shed; it must be “historic” because it was never entered for the 1950 British Grand Prix, though it could have been. Eh! DSJ

You may also like

Related products