Madness!

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

There is an increasing number of times when I wonder if we are simply going mad! Puerile TV shows are rife, political about-turns likewise, but on the motoring front, what about changes in the law relating to driving offences? I have commented, under the heading” War On Drivers”, on the speed cameras, or those “Gatso Big Brothers” (invented by a rally driver, would you believe), on the much-increased fines for motoring offences, on how the police can insist on a car being mobile-confiscated if it has the slightest defect, and so on. On the madness front, what of WDI?

WDI? Yes, “weekly disposable income”, which those who elect to appear in court when convicted of a motoring offence, instead of accepting an on-the-spot fixed-penalty ticket, are required to divulge on a WDI form, if found guilty in a magistrates’ court. The idea is not only to make the punishment fit the crime (and “crime” is correct, for this comes under the 1991 Criminal Justice Act) but also fit the pocket. So a driver found guilty of offences ranging from forgetting to fasten his or her seat belt (or maybe a passenger’s) to alleged dangerous driving, now has to supply the aforesaid information about his or her income, under such headings as outgoings for housing, food, heating (of house, not car, presumably) clothing and travel.

Well, could you give this information without consulting an accountant, or the Inland Revenue? It seems that it is now prudent to have not only a barrister but an auditor in court to aid you..! For what happens if you fill in the WDI date incorrectly, without intention to defraud? Prison or the Tower no doubt… And who checks the information anyway? And is it only the vehicle driver who is subjected to this new legal means-test? Note that whereas a poor man can be fined £20 or thereabouts for a seat-belt offence, an affluent motorist may have to pay up to £500. On a charge of dangerous driving, if proved, the ratio is in the region of £50 to £100, against £2500 for a wealthy offender. The maximum fines under these headings have been increased by £400 and £1500 respectively in recent times; someone has already been fined £774 for 18mph over the M3 limit.

Is the WDI move introduced to persuade more drivers to accept fixed-penalty tickets, instead of defending themselves in court? We all know how difficult it is to defend one’s innocence on a dangerous driving charge, against an ambitious policeman’s evidence, backed up by the kind of civilian witness who flashes his or her headlamps at you when you are performing a perfectly safe overtaking manoeuvre, having purchased a car with the acceleration to make this possible. Now you have the WDI to trouble you as well… Madness? It seems like madness to me. For other examples, talk to the miners.