exeter after thoughts

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

” EXETER ” AFTERTHOUGHTS.

PAUCITY OF GOOD DRIVING.

THE performances of the cars in the 1931 Exeter event bear out the impressions created by the London-Gloucester in December last. That is to say, that drivers do not appear to take trials work seriously enough to consider it worth while taking the trouble to learn the job. Too serious an outlook is a bad thing in any sport, but a definite keenness to perform as well as possible is essential if the game is to be worth playing. A glance at the results of recent events of this sort will show that the first-class awards have been won chiefly by drivers more or less connected with the trade, and that they go to all sorts of cars which in less

competent amateur hands fail to get home.

The Exeter itself was an easy trial this year, and, run in excellent weather, it should have provided a higher percentage of premier awards. But many were lost through carelessness in handling. Higher Hill, which was fairly easily dealt with by the majority, caught out several drivers who were rather too violent in taking the corner, while there were surprising mechanical troubles of a serious nature more usually associated with racing ,such as broken pistons, run big-ends, and even a broken back axle. In trials, however, as opposed to races for which the cars are specially prepared, such breakages cannot be

taken very seriously, as it is impossible to know what wear, rough treatment or even minor crashes the car may have sustained in its past life, and which start some trouble which waits for the occasion of some slight extra strain to give way.

Meerhay was the worst hill from the point of view of failures, owing to the very rough surface, but here again it was usually a definite error in driving or mechanical trouble which caused them.

Two makes which showed up well on hills were Wolseley Hornets and Frazer-Nashes, while the performance of Hollinghurst’s M.G. Magna augurs well for these cars when more are on the road.

Related articles

Related products