1 agree with your Continental Correspondent that for some forms of long-distance travel and for competition the Porsche is hard to beat. However. I maintain that—as strict value for money propositions—some British sports cars can stand up to the Porsche in a free market like Switzerland. Respective prices in Switzerland :
During the last few years I have used first a Porsche and later an Austin-Healey for fast touring, business trips as well as pleasure motoring, in Switzerland and other Continental countries. The Porsche was a 1,300 c.c. coupe, 1951/52 vintage, 44 b.h.p. It was used for more than 30,000 miles. Good points of the Porsche :
Utmost reliability; extremely low maintenance cost; good average performance (cruising speed of 80 plus); no body rattles at all; no roll on corners; excellent behaviour on bad surfaces (gravel roads) and in winter; very economical-28-35 m.p.g.; very comfortable seats; light and positive steering; spacious luggage compartment behind seats, also usable for occasional passenger; top-class service; a factory-sponsored illustrated magazine, Christ°, phorus, was also greatly appreciated. Criticisms :
Unsatisfactory brakes (new linings at 5,000 miles) and always rapid fade after continued mountain work; at high revs. in the lower gears (mountain climbs) noise from engine and transmission rather tiring for passengers; real hot-house in summer, no possibility of draught-free ventilation; disagreeable for continued night-driving, the glare from oncoming cars being much more strongly felt in the Porsche than in either Austin-Healey or M.G.; crash-type gearbox no pure joy with cold engine and transmission; heating equipment insufficient on icy roads when forced to drive at low engine revolutions; considerable tyre wear; some rain entering below the facia (unable to locate source); in fairness to the makers it should be stated that some of the faults have been cured in later types of the car; the much-quoted oversteer characteristics of the car were slightly troubling at first, but with more experience I felt safe and confident in the car under all circumstances. The Austin-Healey 100, 1954, was used so far for 12,000 miles. Here is my appraisal of this car : Good points of the Austin-Henley :
Excellent road performance, adequate acceleration for emergencies; good reliability ; excellent roadholding on average roads: economical, 25-31 m.p.g. with frequent use of overdrive; five gears and delightful gear-change; excellent brakes; light and positive steering; comfortable seats but less so than in the Porsche; adequate heating; adequate luggage compartment. Criticisms :
Insufficient ground clearance (which makes the Austin-Healey unusable as successful rally car), a bad fault ; rather stiff on bud roads; some hard-to-cure body rattles; ventilation inadequate when car closed; tempestuous wind-noise when driven fast with sidescreens on; some rain entering cockpit; no possibility of fitting winding windows; battery badly situated for inspection.
I personally think that Britain offers a competitive range of highperformance cars. The situation seems less happy with Mail family saloons, where some Continental makes offer a combination of sturdiness, performance and service unmatched so far by comparable British cars. I am. Yours, etc.,
Switzerland. FELIX STEINMANN.
Formula 2: The Toleman TG 280-Hart team analysis
The British team with an Italian touch that conquered Europe As with the majority of enthusiasts reading this article, the writer had never met Ted Toleman, or any of a…
Lord Thow gives his impressions about the coming Racing Season
ZorO bow gime Ots jmpresisiono of tbe Coming Racing e5eaoon (In an interviece) T0 the keen follower of motor sport, the prospects for motor racing on the Continent during the…
McLaren-Honda boxes clever
While the majority of Formula One teams elected to test at Paul Ricard prior to the sojourn to the official pre-Brazilian GP tests at Rio's Autodromo Nelson Piquet, Honda Marlboro…