Ford Cortinas – 1200 and 1500

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Sir,

I read with interest your comments concerning the Editorial Cortina GT. My employers have just replaced one of the early Cortina 1200s with the latest 1500 version. The 1200 covered 46,000-odd miles, most of the time at the limit of its performance. The 21 months of intimacy was not without incident. One of the most alarming of these was the tendency of the throttle linkage to become unhitched after bouts of heavy braking. It appears that the rubber mountings of the engine were sufficiently flexible to allow the linkage to be pulled from its nylon bush under severe retardation. This happened about five times, and on four of these the engine “died” but on the other occasion the engine raced, and quick resort was made to the ignition key. ‘he other odd things which “happened” are as follows:––

(1) The pulley fixed to the end of the crankshaft, driving dynamo and fan, parted company from the central boss. It seems that this pulley was made in sandwich form and spot welded, and presumably vibration was the cause. This happened twice in one month.

(2) Two timing-chain tensioners were replaced—there was presumably a design fault here.

(3) Silencer and exhaust piping was replaced because flanges had parted company, probably connected with the aforementioned engine movement under heavy braking.

(4) The engine undershield flopped down, as on the Editorial GT, dragging in the dust, and I, too, had helpful headlamp flashes and pointing fingers drawing my attention to the fact.

(5) The starter motor on occasions refused to engage; this was due to a bent shaft. The motor was replaced.

From the driving angle, I would agree about the seating position. This is too low but has been improved on the latest versions. The plastic upholstery, unbreathing, produced pools of sweat in the hot weather and was very uncomfortable, but this was altered on succeeding models by introduction of a woven fabric.

The gearbox was as sweet as a bird, the syncromesh being very efficient, allowing gear changes sans clutch. The modification of drilling an oil channel was carried out, but I should point out that if the gearbox was likely to seize it would have done so long before because all revs were used frequently.

The brakes (drum) were poor—not necessarily in themselves— but more that they were inadequate for the car’s collosal performance. Here again the feed-back channels to Ford of Britain must work well because the latest versions have wonderful front disc brakes.

The performance of this vehicle was indeed tremendous for a 1200, and on one occasion on the Stevenage By-pass 100 m.p.h. was seen on the clock. Admittedly, this was probably at least 10 m.p.h. fast and conditions were probably favourable, but it does emphasise that the engine is first class. The overall petrol consumption was probably not better than 32 m.p.g. but, bearing in mind the usage, I do not think this was too bad.

No trouble was experienced with instruments but I felt that the right-hand stalk controlling lamps and direction indicators was poor in design. On occasions it was possible to inadvertently cancel a direction signal when gloves were being worn, but the latest version has been improved in this respect.

Bodywork was very good, bearing in mind the price range. “Mine” received washes once per week and was traded in with a new coat of silicone wax polish—the general condition receiving favourable comments from the transport section concerned. I did, however, have trouble with the driver’s door. On one occasion the “dog” which is released when the push-button is used, failed to clear, and I spent an embarrassed 16 minutes breaking into the car in the middle of London with a thin piece of wood! The hinge on the driver’s quarter-light snapped and the whole unit had to be replaced. The windscreen was inclined to shed tears at the bottom corners in heavy rain, but otherwise no rain entered the car.

I too, found the gap between 2nd and 3rd gears was large, but presumably this was the result of a compromise by the Ford engineers. The 3rd gear held up to 60 plus and was useful for passing the “mimsers.”

The appearance of the range I would claim is fine, and I find the appearance of the tail most pleasing, being somewhat reminiscent of the latest Mercedes range—but of course much cheaper! The large rear lamps also seem to blend well—and didn’t I see Cortina rear lamps on the hairy Lola-Ford GT?

To sum up, I feel that the conception of the Cortina range was brilliant; after all, the basics of frame strength and engine reliability must be responsible for the brilliant competition successes Ford have enjoyed (or should I say earned?).

The latest car supplied by my employers seems, on brief encounter (800 miles to date), to be the logical development of the original—all the features I found wanting on the original have been put right—but what about that front-end pulley?

Many thanks for your excellent magazine, which I enjoy monthly, the first port of call being the “Letters from Readers.” Long may you continue to provide the only worthwhile voice in motoring matters.

Peter Staples – Maidstone.

Related articles

Related products