Letters from Readers, February 1975

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

N.B.—Opinions expressed are those of our Correspondents and MOTOR SPORT does not necessarily associate itself with them. —ED.

Napier versus Rolls-Royce

Sir,

I should like to comment on the letter from G.P. La T. Shea-Simonds. In particular re his Miserable comments on the Napier Sabre engine. The Sabre was undeniably the most powerful piston engine in ‘service at the end Of World War IL It did have problems in its early Service career, but it must be borne in mind that Napiers did not have the time or the enormous Government support that Rolls-Royce enjoyed whilst struggling from the early thirties to make the Merlin work.

Rolls-Royce efforts to produce an engine to equal the Sabre were abysmal failures, as anyone who survived the Vulture (Under-) powered Avro Manchester would surely endorse. The later Eagle, a close copy of the Sabre hut ten-litres larger in capacity, produced less power than the Sabre and was abandoned after test-flights in the Westland Wyvern. The Sabre, in the Typhoon and the Tempest, did sterling service in Normandy in 1944 and played a significant part in the Allied liberation of Europe.

Mr. G. P. La T. Shea-Simonds states that he is unfamiliar with L. J, K. Setright’s Superb book on aero engines, “The Power to Fly”. I would respectfully recommend him to read it, for Mr. Setright seems to have discovered as much as is now known about this fine engine which is decried because it is not understood. Rolls-Royce have not exactly gone Out of their way to publicise the Sabre since they killed off Napier, as they did Bristol, Bentley and finally themselves, by their customary underdesign and over development.

Furneux Pelham J, L. WEATHERITT

Another Fiat 124 enthusiast

p>Sir,

Thank you Mr. Sheppy for your remarks regarding the Fiat 124 Sport.

Some six months ago I was under pressure to part with my MG-B and as I won’t see sixty again it had to be replaced by a car which would appeal to my wife and for my Part to retain a sporting image. So with some misgivings I acquired a 1972 Fiat 124 coupe and up to now never regretted it. All Mr. Sheppy claims it does and its stylish appearance is refreshing today when most 1,600 c.c. cars all look alike.

Erdington C. D. WADE

An Open Letter About MG Styling

Sir,

In a letter in this column of last January, I speculated as to what further indignities British Leyland could impose on the Midget. Now we know, and one wonders whether it is all -a had dream. What sort of market research does the company carry out among MG owners before embarking on these hideous alterations? And what’s happened to those once familiar advertisements? Is “Your mother wouldn’t like it” to be changed to “Your mother (or anybody else for that matter) wouldn’t be seen dead in it”?

It is common knowledge that Lord Stokes is most unenthusiastic about the sports car side of his company. He probably considers that the factory space could he more profitably used for turning out his highly unimaginative and unattractive saloons. All right, fair enough. Let him dispose of MG altogether to somebody who would show more willing an interest in it, and run a new independent small company on the lines of, say, Morgan. There would be plenty Of potential customers, and surely this would be better than turning MG into a music-hall joke. So Lord Stokes, how about it?

Cheshire. JOHN F. L. WOOD

[It is not altogether true that Lord Stokes is anti-sports-cars but we know what our correspondent means—ED.!

A Russian Hybrid

Sir,

I enclose a photo which may be of interest to you and MOTOR SPORT readers. The picture shows a 1936 Lancia extensively modified by its owner, who is with the car. He has fitted a three-cylinder, two-stroke Wartburg engine and gearbox, and wheels and rear axle of unknown Russian origin.

The owner is a tractor-driver on one of the huge co-operative farms (this one was over 200,000 acres!) in Bulgaria, where I took the picture last October. The car is in quite good condition, and seems to have a remarkable “cross-country” ability, because the driver took it to wherever he was working, when the only other vehicles on the land were tractors or the Russian-built “jeeps”.

Midhurst A. G. HODGEKISS

Suppress Big Nanny!

Sir,

It is the contention of some people that the individual does not have the right to place himself at risk whilst driving, by choosing not to wear his seat-belt. They argue that the resultant burden on the Health Service, loss of productivity, and anguish caused to relatives in the case of an accident is unacceptable to society.

If this principle is accepted, then it is indeed the thin end of a very large wedge.

Each year, in pursuit of their leisure, a few yachtsmen are drowned and amateur racing drivers killed or injured. The same applies in rock climbing, private flying and many other sports. The application of the principle would surely result in the outlawing of all such activities, particularly as the acceptable degree of risk would bound to be lower for non-essential leisure pursuits than, for example, driving, much of which is done in pursuit of productive business.

History is full of the results of well meaning, but short-sighted people failing to appreciate the broader implications of their actions.

Basingstoke A. W. JONES

In Favour of Lancia

Sir,

I have been looking through a MOTOR SPORT, dated March 1964, which I found particularly interesting on account of its potted history of Lancia.

Immediately after the last war, the big one, I mean, 1939-1945, I had a craving to own a Lancia Aprilia. The reason seems now to have been due to the fact that Lancia and Aprilia were such pretty names. However, an attack of poverty, thought then to be acute, but now accepted as chronic, necessitated acceptance of a 1937 Singer Bantam as the mode de transport.

Since then, my taste in motor cars has been satisfied through ownership of some thirty-five cars, including a 1933 Humber Sedanca de Ville, R-type Bentley, some Rileys, an MG, several Austins, and, more recently, art E-type Jaguar.

I thought, when having the Jaguar, that this would be difficult to follow, unless through a second mortgage I might acquire a Porsche or Daytona. I was surprised therefore to find myself selling the E-type and buying a Lancia Fulvia 1.3 sedan. The two cars were so very different as to make direct comparison impossible. On its own merits, however, the Fulvia was an excellent car, giving a standard of driving potential far ahead of that suggested by its outward appearance.

The sedan has now been replaced by a 1.35 Zagato coupé. Here indeed is a car worthy of praise. You, Sir, will undoubtedly be aware of the endearing qualities of these little cars, Using the gearbox to the full, and keeping the revs above 3,500 can produce truly astonishing averages. In asking to be driven hard, the car responds by providing a standard of stability and roadholding equalled by few, and bettered by even fewer. The petrol consumption figures are amazing, and are undoubtedly due to a good shape: wind noise is the lowest I have ever experienced.

To sum up, it has taken me a long time to get my Lancia, and the problem of what to get next is indeed a real one. Perhaps the lords and masters at Fiat can be persuaded not to indulge in badge engineering. The Lancia tradition is well worth preserving, and will always find devoted followers, not the least of whom will be,

Kenilworth H. BIGGS

You may also like

Related products