The Comet

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

It is understandable that, after a considerable period of time, even cars that had a reasonable production-run should be forgotten by the majority of those associated with the motoring world. But there are several which were either made in very small numbers indeed or which never went into production — the sad “lost causes”, or “never-successfuls” of the automotive firmament. Such a car was the Comet, promising as it seemed when it was announced early in 1935.

It was to have been a fast small-car of advanced specification, to be manufactured by the Invicta Welding and Engineering Company Ltd at the lnvicta Works, in Sutton, Surrey. It was the brainchild of a Mr Kirkland, who, when designing the Comet, said he was as much concerned with comfort and refinement, and of course reliability and durability, as with speed. The engine, of I 203cc, was in the 10hp taxation bracket. It had a bore and stroke of 63.5 x 95mm and would have commanded an annual tax of just £7.10/(0.50) in 1935.

It is an established fact that producers of motor cars in small numbers have seldom been able to bear the expense and manufacturing complication of making their own engines. So it is interesting to try to define what proprietary power-unit Mr Kirkland had adopted for his ideal car. We know the bore and stroke, assuming he had not bored out or lined-down the cylinders, or had made a new crankshaft. However, this takes us nowhere. When Vale Engineering was using Triumph engines, HRG Meadows (and later Singer) power-units, Buckler and others were relying on Ford-power and AFN put various makes of bought-out engines into the Frazer Nash, what did Kirkland do?

He could have been using a bored-out BSA engine, except that this was a side-valve power unit with a two-bearing crankshaft, whereas the Comet had vertical overhead valves and conventional push-rod-and-rocker valve-gear and three-bearing crankshaft. The Ford Ten comes close and could have been given overhead valves but if you read on, you will see the improbabilities of this. I liked the thought of a Talbot Ten motor, but dismissed it for the just-explained reason, and if a (bored-out) Riley engine had been available, which I think unlikely, would Kirkland have foresaken its excellent hemispherical cylinder head? No, I think we must assume, like the ambitious Geoffrey Taylor at Alta, that the Invicta Works was equipped to make engines, although more than skilled welding is involved.

In fact, the Comet had a truly advanced power-plant. The cylinder block was of nickelcast iron, with chrome liners, the three-bearing crankshaft of chrome nickel. Y-alloy was used for the crankcase, and the pistons were of heat-treated silicon alloy, with duralumin conrods. Nor was that all. The cylinder head was of hiduminium, with manganese-bronze valveseats and bronze valve guides. The valve-gear, although conventional, embodied duralumin rockers and push-rods, the latter steel helmeted. It was claimed that the combustion chambers gave good gas turbulance round the sparking-plugs, which were fired from a special kind of coil. The two inlet manifolds each had a downdraught carburettor, hot-spotted from the three-branch exhaust manifold at two points.

Carburettors and manifolding were on the off-side, as was the long water off-take pipe. The valve cover, and a domed tappet cover on the near-side of the Comet’s engine, were retained, respectively, by three, and two, big threaded discs, which should have given me a clue to the engine’s origins, if it was bought out, but didn’t. The water delivery pipe from the tall radiator fed into the front of the head, for the pump cooling system. Lubrication was by a submerged oil pump which fed, via a filter, a galley cast in the cylinder block, from which oil went to the main bearings and from another channel to the valve-rocker shaft. Oil then drained back to the sump via the push-rod tunnels, there being a complete absence of oil pipes of any kind. The sheet metal sump held 1.5 gallons of lubricant and possessed air tunnels for cooling purposes, Riley fashion.

The drive went through a Borg & Beck clutch to a four-speed unit gearbox giving ratios of 18.5, 10.8, 6.4 and 4.5 to 1, with a 24 to1I reverse. This power pack was four-point mounted, on Hartford Silentblocs at the front, rubber buffers at the back. An MG-like remote-control tunnel covered the rods uniting stubby central gear lever with the gearbox. Further advanced thinking was seen in the Comet’s chassis frame. There was a massive, drilled, X-shaped central cross-member, and independent front suspension was used, at a time when, although this was to be found on continental cars such as Delage, Mercedes-Benz, Peugeot, etc and featured on some American cars, only Alvis used it in Britain and Vauxhall had yet to impress visitors to the 1935 Olympia Show by introducing it, enabled to do so by borrowing the Dubonnet system from Opel, which was also part of the General Motors’ empire.

It was then unknown on small cars. Yet here it was, in the Comet’s specification. I think a proprietory design may have been incorporated. It used transverse coil springs, coupled to the lower of two fabricated wishbones by bell-cranks. Two friction shock-absorbers were fitted on each side and the front wheels remained vertical as they rose and fell. Accurate Bishop steering gear, half-elliptic rear springs with two large hydraulic shock-absorbers, Silentbloc chassis bushes to reduce maintenance chores, an 8-gallon rear fuel tank with mechanical feed, and centre-lock wire wheels completed the Comet’s specification. It had a wheelbase of 7ft 9in, a front track of 3ft 10in and a rear track of 3ft 9in. The plan had been to offer it in three forms, two-seater, four-seater (both at £435) and saloon, the last, perhaps all three bodies, to be contracted out to E D Abbot Ltd of Farnham, which in 1935 was making special bodies on Lagonda Rapier chassis and who were also responsible for racing bodywork, such as that on Le Strange Metcalfe’s Abbot-Nash.

Since the beginning of 1935 an experimental Comet had been on test. But as the announcement in January 1935 stated that “it is expected that a speed over 80mph will be possible”, presumably the engine in that test chassis was not fully developed. By the release date it was claimed that nearly 50bhp was being developed at 5000rpm, with a safe rev-limit of 5500rpm, which was exceptionally high for a production car at that time. At 3000rpm the Comet’s engine gave 30bhp. Later in 1935 production was said to be commencing. But did it ever commence?

This promising little car faded away, like heavenly Comets do. Does anyone know why? WB