Legend records it as a race where Gilles Villeneuve was robbed of a rightful victory by a duplicitous Didier Pironi. There is no doubt that Gilles was sincere in his belief that he’d been tricked by a team-mate he’d trusted. But perhaps the story wasn’t as black and white as the Gillesfavouring press at the time believed — and reported.
Pironi was interviewed by Tony Dodgins for Autosport in 1986. He stated: “When I passed Villeneuve for the first time [after leader Amoux had retired] it was because he had made a mistake and gone off the circuit. The first ‘slow’ sign we got was a few laps after that, and I was leading.
“Gilles overtook me after that, and by then we knew we had a lot of fuel left because of the way we’d driven the first half. You’ll remember this was the race where the FOCA teams carried out a boycott. Well, I’ve never said this before, but we had a meeting before the race — Amoux, Prost, Gilles and me in my motorhome. We agreed to make a spectacle for the first half so long as our positions on the lap after half-distance were the same as on the grid. Only then would we start the real race. So I had plenty of fuel…” Today, Amoux confirms these details.
Gilles’ take — famously recorded by Nigel Roebuck in Autosport at the time — was: “Imola was going to be my race because I was in front of Pironi when Amoux dropped out. As soon as the Renault was out, I relaxed, slowed the pace. The only thing that was in my head was making the fuel last; Pironi had dropped back and that let him catch up. I made a mistake coming out of a corner, and he passed me. I wasn’t worried; I figured he would lead a couple of laps then give it back.”
The Ferrari pits were orchestrated by Marco Piccinini. Today, he says: “We know exactly what happened, but it doesn’t correspond with the general belief. It was a genuine misunderstanding triggered by Gilles making a mistake. He went off the circuit slightly and Didier passed. The ‘slow’ sign may have come before or after that — I can’t recall after 20 years. But I don’t think this is so important as it might seem. The sign was hung out because we were 1-2, not because we favoured one driver over the other. We didn’t favour either because it was at an early stage of the championship. We just wanted to maintain 1-2.
“It was complicated by the private agreement between the drivels. They had an agreement, but it wasn’t so detailed that it said what would happen if one made a mistake.”
Mauro Forghieri wasn’t there that weekend, “for personal reasons. I wished I could have been there to manage the situation in a more clear and right way.” Such as a sign that might have read: ‘1 — GV, 2— DP’ rather than simply ‘slow’. “Gilles was an innocent believer. He had a right to be after sacrificing his chances over the years for the team.”
Villeneuve thought the race was his because he was in front when Amoux went out — and had outpaced Pironi all weekend. Pironi believed he was entitled to fight because Gilles made a mistake. When combined with ambiguous pit signalling, it was a situation open to interpretation. In his innocence and naivety, Villeneuve didn’t expect Pironi’s interpretation to differ from his own.
Caracciola (Mercedes) Wins the Eifel Race .
Caracciola (Mercedes) Wins the Eifel Race. THE Eifel Race, which was run On the Niirburg Ring on 7th June, over a total distance of forty laps of the circuit, or…
The Wartime Diaries of an RFC Officer
The Wartime Diaries of an RFC Officer (Continued from the November issue) WE HAVE reached the Diary entries of "X", the RFC Officer who became a well-known racing motorist after…
Letters from Readers, April 1953
N.B. Opinions expressed are those of our correspondents and Motor Sport does not necessarily associate itself with them -- Ed. Nationalise Car Insurance? Sir, I feel that I must…