F1’s moment of shame at the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Max Verstappen is undoubtedly a worthy champion but the season finale should have been handled differently. Mark Hughes has his say on the Michael Masi mess

Max Verstappen passes Lewis Hamilton in the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Verstappen and Hamilton played out a superb season, only to have the result muddied by a questionable use of the rules

Joe Portlock/F1 via Getty Images

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

In the end Mercedes withdrew its appeal contesting the result of the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, but what happened there was wrong. There may be ways of justifying it with slippery wording, but fundamentally it was wrong to prioritise showbusiness over sporting integrity in the way the race was restarted.

With just one racing lap left, allowing the lapped cars between the old-tyred race leader Lewis Hamilton and his rival Max Verstappen – on fresh tyres around 2sec faster – to unlap themselves prepared the lamb to the slaughter as the safety car released them. A non-legitimate interpretation of the sporting regulations had changed the natural outcome of the race and the world championship. The identities of the beneficiary and the victim, and whatever luck or on-track injustices they’d endured through the season up to that point, is irrelevant. Those were all ‘natural’ racing outcomes. This, however, was not and it effectively invalidated the whole incredible contest, the battle which had brought them to the finale after 21 races equal on points.

“Masi is being set up to fail, but that doesn’t change the fact that in making that choice, he did fail”

Mercedes lodged a protest on the night, arguing that sporting regulation procedure had not been followed, that article 48.12 stated clearly that the safety car would come in a lap after any lapped cars had unlapped themselves. The stewards threw this out on the grounds that article 48.13 overrode 48.12 in that it “allows the race director to control the use of the safety car, which in our determination includes its deployment and withdrawal”. In other words, according to the stewards, it’s at the race director’s discretion to interpret whichever regulation he pleases to legitimise the actions he wishes to take and any regulation which contradicts that aim can be dismissed as subservient. He can, according to this interpretation by the stewards, decide which rules to apply and to vary them as he sees fit. That’s not a principle that’s ever previously been understood to be within the race director’s powers.

It is surely doubtful that Article 48.13 was drafted in a way to allow it to override the previous and operate independently of that regulation. The fact that it is within the same sub-section implies that it’s not independent of it and that it’s written from the perspective of 48.12 having been met. If 48.13 allows the race director to override any of the other articles within the article 48 section, then it implies he can decide all manner of things which have never previously been considered to be under his remit.

Mercedes officials leave stewards hearing after 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

Mercedes got legal right after the race

Alamy

It’s too easy to make race director Michael Masi the bad guy, in that it was his decision to make a totally unprecedented interpretation of the sporting regulations. But Masi was trying to satisfy an impossible combination of demands put upon him. Among his general remit is one from Formula 1 itself – agreed to by all the teams – that wherever possible races shouldn’t end behind the safety car, that every effort should be made to get the cars actually racing to the chequered flag, even if it is only for one single lap.

That’s an understandable objective, but should that extend to subverting the existing regulations? Because that’s what he needed to do here in order to achieve that objective. While in the midst of trying to satisfy that demand, he was being lobbied in real time by the competing teams, by both the sporting directors and the team principals of each team. The chances of making every single call correctly, in a time-pressured situation, are surely slim. Yes, whatever decisions he made in those stressed few minutes and seconds can be post-hoc justified by picking and twisting at the wording of regulation – but at that point it begins to enter the world of Alice in Wonderland, where Humpty Dumpty says, “When I use a word it means just whatever I choose it to mean.”

Safety car leads Lewis Hamilton at the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix

The late safety car, and the race director’s choices, decided the title

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

Masi is not only having to make decisions in real time in confusing circumstances while being bombarded by lobbyists, he is up against armies of people and computers in the teams looking at every possible scenario and fully informed in a way he cannot be. In between those moments of stress he might be helping marshals brush cement dust off the track. It’s too much. He is being set up to fail. But that doesn’t change the fact that in making that decision, he did fail. As the title implies, he’s there to direct the race, not dictate it.

It would be a nonsense to change the outcome of the title after the event. But this one was decided in a non-legitimate way by incorrect application of the FIA’s own sporting regulations. After such an amazing season it’s deeply sad. Either driver would have been fully deserving of the title and so closely matched were they that only the on-track vagaries of weather, traffic and the effect of the actions of other drivers would have separated them.

That’s just racing luck – as was Nicholas Latifi crashing when he did. But what followed invalidated the championship contest, the totting up of points to decide who is the champion. If you base a category around the premise of that totting up, and incorrect application of a regulation decides the outcome, then something is badly wrong. The imperative to be racing at the flag for the sake of drama was accorded so much disproportionate priority that it completely polluted the sporting integrity of the contest. We need a better balance than this.