The trade explains

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Sir,

The letter from Jeremy Woods in the December issue almost makes me feel guilty since I am partly responsible for the Morgan van advertised at £475. On quickly reading his letter anybody might be led to believe that our company is making a vast profit and I think that any jury should hear both sides of the story before making judgement.

I bought the car two years ago for £250. It was a high price but I was told that it had undergone complete restoration (the appearance certainly suggested that this might be the case). My first five runs ended thus: 1. (the day I collected it) oil pipes blocked, battery flat, towed home. 2. magneto armature went soggy, towed home. 3. loose bolt in flywheel went thro’ rear of crankcase and rear main, towed home. 5. prop. shaft broke, towed home. All this took many weeks and quite a bit of cash to put right after which I was a penniless enthusiast; actually the enthusiasm was wearing a bit thin as well) but at the end of it I reckoned that I mutt have a damned good Moggie. Alas on the sixth run the rear wheel bearings seized and I was lucky not to loose the wheel altogether. However, perseverance usually wins through and after swapping the JAP engine for a Matchless. I finally overcame the front end problems. At this time my accessory business needed an eyecatching van and since I could not afford another machine I built the van body to fit the rear of the Moggie.

The new body was interchangeable from the beetle back and I den’t think that it detracted from what was not an “Original” Morgan in the first place.

Eventually I tied up with Antique Automobiles and the van took on new colours: Throughout this year it has performed quite well and is now being sold to make way for a Leyland bus. Quite apart from the space we need the cash. The Complete Automobilist Ltd. is a small company run by enthusiasts for enthusiasts and simply cannot afford to sell et a greater loss than necessary.

Come on all you Mogmen—if you all bought the odd grease nipple or roll of jointing paper from us we might be able to sell all our vehicles at a loss for the benefit of those with ability and time but no cash.

Baston.
A. T. FRASER.
Manager,
The. Complete Automobilist Ltd.