"Two Fiat 'Firsts' and a Fiat Failure"

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Sir,

With reference to your article on Fiat in the 1923 200-Mile Race: in a hook entitled “The Romantic Story of Motor Racing”, by Sir Malcolm Campbell, he mentions a brief account of the race.

He mentions both cars as having superchargers but names no one make. He goes on to say that he and Salamano had an agreement that whoever held the lead after the first lap would stay in front until to laps from home and then every man for himself, but as we know the Fiats never got that far. He explains that -Salatnano’s car stopped, and his own engine died: “I coasted to the pits, there to discover that I had broken a connecting-rod, while Salamano’s car suffered a similar fate”.

In the book there appears a photograph, taken at the pits; showing Campbell sitting in his car with the bonnet raised and mechanics inspecting the engine, whilst a few others look on. As far as the cause of engine failure, Campbell mentions lapping at around the 100 mark behind Salamano’s car, expecting him to ease up; instead he increased speed and Campbell followed suit until they were both lapping at about to m.p.h. faster than the fastest of the other ears; this would mean a speed of about 107 m.p.h., as opposed to 97 m.p.h. of Eyston’s Aston-Martin and Joyce’s AC; surely such a pace so early in the race must have had disastrous effects on a relatively cold engine? The fact that a picture appears with the bonnet of Campbell’s car raised flatly contradicts The Light Car & Cyclecar.

Sunbury-on-Thames.
S. J. SMITH.

[This is interesting but the suggestion that Campbell and Salamano duelled at 107 m.p.h. lap speed early in the race is not borne out by the official fastest lap, which they shared, of 101.64 m.p.h., and in any case Campbell passed Salamano after three laps, possibly because he had been instructed to win and the Italian let him through for just that purpose, or because Salamano’s engine was already giving trouble at that stage of the race. When The Light Car & Cyclecar said the bonnets were never opened after the Fiats had retired they presumably intended this to mean .after the initial investigation Of the “blow-ups”—not opened, in other words, where prying eyes could later see them.—ED.}

You may also like

Related products