Justice!

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,

My own first-time experience of Magistrates’ Court penalisation, and completely blame-free involvement in a fairly heavy shunt, may serve to illustrate the puzzling inconsistency of Britain’s legal and police processes.

Six months ago, I fell foul of an Essex police radar trap—doing an inexcusable 56 m.p.h. in a 30 m.p.h. road, albeit with no danger and very little traffic at the time. For this first-ever offence in 39 years of motoring I was fined £35 . . .

A year ago, while driving across a signal-controlled road junction in Teddington, with the signals in my favour, another motorist ignored the red light against him, hurtled across the junction at around 40 m.p.h. and slammed into the side of my 24-hour-old Capri. Quick reaction and good steering saved me from being shunted into a head-on collision, and the (very confused) offender could offer no explanation. Having two independent, voluntary witnesses, and a lot of damage to be put right, I reported the accident to the police and suggested that the light-jumper be prosecuted for dangerous driving. Long statements were taken, forms filled in, etc., with the result—that nothing has happened since, and, presumably, the culprit escaped without penalty.

One can only assume that the law-enforcers of Middlesex and Essex work from opposite ends of the book, and that the Teddington light-jumper might have gone down for life if he had been hauled up before the Grays Magistrates!

(Name and address supplied.)