No Compulsion

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

No Compulsion

Sir,

I write as one of your readers on the subject of compulsory wearing of seat belts in cars. I understand there is to be a Free Vote on this matter in Parliament in due course.

However, should such a proposal become law it will be unique—as far as I am aware— in being designed solely to restrict the freedom of the individual and not to protect society against the exercise of such freedom. It would be equally valid to forbid swimming without a lifebelt or to change a light bulb unclad in rubber boots. I am sure that many who feel as I do will point out the dangers of wearing a belt in an open car or in a thousand other accidents where constraint could mean death. Even the most dedicated seat-belt wearers will admit that it does not guarantee complete immunity from all injury. The actual proportion may be appreciable, but is not large.

Put against this proportion the number of people who will be killed or injured as a result of wearing a belt—and you can be quite certain that there will be many. I imagine those who support such a measure will not be liable to prosecution by those who suffer as a result, but I for one would rather not have such suffering or death on my conscience. As matters stand today, a man can choose to wear a belt or not. If he has an accident and is killed you may say that he chose unwisely. But the decision was his. If this contentious law is passed it will also be unique in that its observance may lead to the grave.

Finally, I would invoke your sympathy for the police who will have to see that such a measure if passed is observed. This will put them in a most uphappy position. Most people support the law and the police who maintain it. But the man or woman who is terrified of being trapped in a burning car and is unable through injury or other factors to undo the belt will look upon the police officer as little short of a licensed murderer. People are not all the same and must not be treated as such—each makes his own heaven and his own hell—the Government must not attempt to take over this.

Colchester B. H. CLINKARD

Lt. Cdr.

You may also like

Related products