Will we keep the British GP?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Guest column – Sir Jackie Stewart

It’s been more than six months since Sir Jackie Stewart resigned as president of the BRDC. Motor Sport asked him for his thoughts about the Club and the British GP. Here are his comments…

Since announcing that I was going to stand down as BRDC president I’ve stayed away from any involvement. I occasionally get phone calls, some from board members, but really only for observations and maybe access to certain opportunities. So I haven’t really discussed anything until now.

However, I do still think that the joint venture proposal was the correct way to go. Risk matters to a private members club; it’s like being a trustee for some organisation. You’ve got to be very careful that you don’t speculate and lose the financial currency that this club or individual may have. 

So the joint venture was the right thing, and I think more people are beginning to realise that now. Unfortunately, a minority lacked confidence in the board. It’s very easy for someone to criticise when they haven’t been involved. 

There is always a small but vocal minority who seem to want to find ways of not doing things, being critical rather than being positive and being achievers. For the people who get things done, that’s always quite frustrating. But you’ve got to understand that you’re serving a club full of members.

For the benefits involved, the BRDC has very low subscriptions. People who have been racing drivers are invited to be part of our Club – we don’t promote sales of membership. They’ve become used to those benefits and don’t want to see them diminished, even though there are financial concerns about sustaining them. So it’s a balancing act, like crossing a river on a very small piece of wood, to get it right. 

When the contract for the British GP was for an amount of money that allowed a profit to be made, that profit was put back into the Club. One of the things they built was the clubhouse – well before my time. They’ve been criticised for that, but our Club should be proud of it, because before it was a modest brick and wood building that would have been way out of place in a modern F1 facility. 

The silent minority are just pleased to be members, pleased to have the facilities and benefits, and want to keep the British GP in this country, but not at any cost. Everyone would like to see new pit and paddock facilities, but that still doesn’t help the general public, the man or woman on the street who wants to come and see a grand prix. It serves a group of people for their own comfort and convenience, while not adding anything to the opportunity of raising the attendance figures of the grand prix. And we can’t do that. 

The promoter at the present time is left naked financially. He only gets the benefits of the public attendance. You don’t have to be Einstein to work out that you can’t make improvements from no revenues. We spent a lot of money on the circuit, on safety and so on. But then we were making actual profit, and profit has to happen.

Unless there’s a new alignment of the financial arrangements in the sport, there’s very little chance that we can keep the grand prix and meet the demands for facilities. It’s easy to say that they can be met in India or Mexico, but like in China and Bahrain, it won’t be private enterprise that will be doing it. If that’s what we’re competing against, we can’t have a grand prix. I hope that’s not the case.

Related articles

Related products