Matters of Moment, January 2013

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

If Lewis Hamilton is a Motor Sport reader, which I grant you is something of a long shot, there’s a quote from his new boss in this issue which may cause him some cheer as he contemplates a potentially tricky ‘fresh start’ in Formula 1 for 2013.

Back in 1990, Ross Brawn stepped away from Grand Prix racing to mastermind the car that graces our cover and what turned out to be Jaguar’s unforgettable swansong in Group C sports car racing. For anyone who witnessed the short-lived wonder that was the XJR-14, it was clear that things would never be the same again. That Group C wouldn’t survive the era of 3.5-litre Formula 1 engines was a sad consequence, but it was hardly Brawn and Tom Walkinshaw Racing’s fault. As Ross tells Gary Watkins this month, all he did was to adopt what he calls a “competitive interpretation” of the regulations he had to work with, in the timehonoured fashion of Chapman, Barnard, Murray and so on.

So if Lewis is regretting his move from McLaren to Mercedes-Benz as much as Martin Whitmarsh has suggested he might be — which I strongly doubt — he can take succour from something I’m sure he knows only too well: that his new boss has a history of setting the agenda when regulations are rewritten.

“That Jaguar project provided a lesson about taking opportunities with new rules,” Brawn tells us. “It taught me that when new regulations come along you can’t start early enough on designing and developing a car. I think I can say it was probably significant in Brawn GP’s success in 2009.”

In other words, mighty Mercedes will already be well ahead in its plans for the new 1.6-litre turbo efficiency formula that will take its bow in 2014. Granted, with rules stability for the 2013 season Mercedes might struggle to claw back all of its lost ground for Hamilton’s first year. But Brawn and his team are too good and have too much ‘previous’ to remain mired in the midfield. Nothing stays the same in Formula 1 for long. Lewis Hamilton is going to be just fine.

*

The success of the DeltaWing was one of the best motor racing stories of the past season. But will the tale continue into 2013 and beyond? There are no guarantees at this stage, despite the Nissan-powered machine’s headlinestealing performance at Le Mans, where it claimed the ’56th garage’ experimental entry for the 24 Hours. In October, the car survived being turned over in a collision with a GT Porsche during testing at Road Atlanta, to finish the 1000-mile Petit Le Mans fifth overall, albeit unclassified thanks to its unique status outside any rule book yet written. The thing clearly has potential.

The American Le Mans Series has kept the door open by creating a special invitational class for the DeltaWing in 2013, but despite the patronage of championship founder Don Panoz, and so much support and development work by both Nissan and Michelin, none of the parties have yet to confirm their continued support for Ben Bowlby’s ground-breaking creation.

The British designer was on hand at the RAC in Pall Mall to pick up the Simms Medal, awarded for innovation that exemplifies a ‘spirit of adventure’, during a lunch at the club at the end of October. “The concept has proven more important than I realised when I started,” he told me, with a fully justified glow of satisfaction. “I just wanted to show what you could do without a rule book. The interest in the DeltaWing shows that innovation appeals to the crowds.”

Doubts that the car would even turn corners have long since been scotched, to be replaced by genuine worldwide respect. Bowlby dared to be different, to try something new — and it paid off. “It is very gratifying,” he admitted. “People used to ask ‘will it turn?’, but now their question is ‘how?’. It’s a genuine story and it was never a publicity stunt. Ulrich Baretzky once told me that the power of motor sport is that it can change people’s perceptions of a technology, and that’s what I hope we’ve achieved.”

Audi’s famed engine man knows of which he speaks, from four-wheel-drive rally cars to his own turbodiesel Le Mans game-changer. But it’s always been this way, Bowlby citing Alec Issigonis’s Mini and how it only really took off once the likes of Sir John Whitmore and Paddy Hopkirk proved the little car’s worth on both track and stage. Racing improves the breed — if rules and budgets allow.

Bowlby reckons that had Satoshi Motoyama not been nerfed out of the race so early at Le Mans in June, the DeltaWing could have completed an incredible 10 stints on one set of tyres, such was its efficiency. And after only two races, there’s clearly more to discover.

So where to next, if Bowlby has his way? “What I don’t want to see is a bunch of cloned DeltaWings running around like a one-make series, because that goes against everything it stands for,” he said. “I’d like multiple engine manufacturers to support it, for it to be a proving ground for the next direction on better efficiency. And it shouldn’t just be about winning. Look at Nissan — they didn’t win Le Mans and yet they got an enormous return on their investment.”

No doubts, Nissan performed a golden PR coup in 2012. So who’s up for some more of the same in 2013?

*

The world of Fl never ceases to amaze when it comes to showing how out of touch it is with the real world. As you can read on page 20, Bernie Ecclestone has proposed his teams should work to a new budget cap, to reduce costs and help secure their futures. Fine. It’s not a new idea and most would agree that if restrictions can be properly policed, it makes sense. So what is Bernie’s definition of a suitably stringent austerity measure? A sum of $250m. Yep, that’s right — £155m. Yeah, that’ll do it.

Forgive me, but I thought one of the benefits of a budget cap would be to allow the smaller teams to compete on more of an equal footing with the big guns? I’ve clearly got the wrong end of the stick. Take a team such as Marussia, which spends in the region of £60m a year. If the top teams can still spend more than double available to the minnows, the ‘cap’ is utterly pointless. Isn’t it?

And just think about that Marussia budget for a brief moment: £60m in the real world is a massive amount of money, and of course it’s way beyond the levels spent elsewhere in motor sport. To offer some perspective, a season in the FIA World Endurance Championship, for a two-car LMP1 campaign, would cost less than a tenth of what Marussia spends. Sure, there’s more at stake in Fl and it should cost more if you want to join the elite. But the chasm between Grand Prix racing and the rest of the motor sport world is now unbridgeable. Which is probably exactly how Bernie likes it. Funny old world.