Letters: January 2018

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

Current page

199

Current page

200

Current page

201

Current page

202

Current page

203

Current page

204

Current page

205

Current page

206

Current page

207

Current page

208

Current page

209

Making plans for Nigel

I have enjoyed the recent series of technical retrospectives. The underlying reasons for a car’s speed are always interesting.

Nigel Rees’s sidebar article on the 1930s Auto Unions (Motor Sport, November), and how they set back perceptions of mid-engined advantages, caught my interest. History tends to forget that Auto Union learned quickly and, having disposed of a certain Dr Porsche, put a De Dion rear axle and pannier fuel tanks in the cars for the 1938 and 1939 seasons.

One would expect this to have sorted them out, and perhaps it did, but results suggest otherwise. From 1934 to 1937 Mercedes outscored the swing-axle Auto Unions by 12 Grandes Épreuves to six. In 1938 and 1939 they outscored them by six to two, so what was wrong with the later Auto Unions?

Perhaps Nigel can explore this for us?

Incidentally, the pleasure of opening a fresh Motor Sport remains undiminished after 45 years.
Patrick Irwin, Port Melbourne, Australia 

 

Ecclestone like Trump?

Bernie Ecclestone is gone from Formula 1, and that’s good.

I wake up every morning to a steady barrage of claims, denials, boasts and lies from his political clone in the US.

With either of them, the only thing I can believe is that their comments are totally self-serving and will be contradicted in an instant if the climate changes.

Bernie did a lot of good and at least as much bad, all of it for the same reason: to enrich himself

Please stop wasting good paper or bandwidth by continuing to feed the ego of a greedy, narcissistic old man.
John Tuleibitz, Simpsonville, South Carolina

 

Plane, strains & automobiles

Formula 1 front wings are presently vulnerable and potentially troublesome. They should be reduced in width to a measurement equal to that between the inside faces of the front wheels and they should be of a single plane. There should be no bodywork ahead of the front wheels. This would do away with unnecessary punctures and damage, necessitating a pit visit. It would also address the cost problems to teams who seem to produce several (expensive) new wings every race weekend.

The loss of downforce at the front would have to be addressed at the rear and the overall effect should make cars less stable and increase the relevance of driver input. Rules changed to make the cars go slightly quicker over a lap make no difference to the spectator at the side of the track or watching on TV. Spectators want to see drivers in cars that are not stuck to the road, showcasing their skills rather than just guiding a missile.
William H Cole, Cheltenham, Glos

 

The generation game

I liked Nick Trott’s idea of a one-make endurance series for three racing generations – those of us relatively new to the game can learn so much from the old masters.

My family has been racing vintage Bentleys for four generations and a few years ago my father, brother and I competed in the same event at the wheel of 1920s Bentleys. I cannot remember how we got on, but surely that has to be a first?

My grandfather? He retired from racing only last year after almost 65 seasons…

Keep up the great work. I love the magazine.
Stuart Morley, via email 

 

Crown jewels

Could someone please tell me where I can obtain a pair of Ferrari-tinted spectacles as issued to all Formula 1 stewards? My grandson is called Sebastian and will be absolutely thrilled to discover that, while I’m wearing them, he can do no wrong.

Can someone from Mercedes also explain why, after spending millions on shaving as much weight as possible from their F1 cars, they allow Lewis to climb in wearing half a ton of unnecessary bling? The way things are going, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Roscoe pop his head out of the cockpit on the slowing-down lap at Monaco in 2018.

That said, I think he has had a very good season – as did Red Bull and Max Verstappen, who did an exceptional job of developing and winning with an underpowered car.
Paul Beever, Leeds, West Yorks

 

Food for thought

I couldn’t resist taking a peek at my latest digital edition of Motor Sport as soon as it became available, though I showed considerable restraint and limited myself to Lunch with Ari Vatanen – what a fabulous story and Joe Dunn wrote it so well, too.

It got me thinking about a potential feature series for the future: Life after racing. It would focus on those, like Ari, who went on to do interesting things outside the sport. Niki Lauda and Jody Scheckter spring to mind.

Here in Canada we’ve just about wrapped up another season, rallying and ice racing apart, but I’m semi-retired and look forward to soaking up the fumes and sound once again at Daytona in January.
Bill Shepherd, Ontario, Canada

 

Here comes the sun

I consider myself very lucky, living in Western Australia close to glorious beaches and with access to nice cars for both road and track. And yet, when the latest Motor Sport arrives, it inevitably brightens my day.

As a long-time competitor in local racing, I love the new Garagista and Speedshop sections, plus all the regular features. Dickie Meaden’s articles are always worth reading at least twice as are Simon Arron’s insights into UK club racing.

I buy many similar publications every year, but if I could only afford one it would be the mighty Motor Sport.

Thanks for a brilliant publication.
John Hurney, Perth, Australia

 

Hughes on the mark

I write in support of the refreshed version of Motor Sport, especially the matt laminate cover and the regrouping of your specialist contributors towards the front of the magazine.

As for Mark Hughes, no one else is more informed, incisive and balanced when writing about Formula 1.

I have been a cover-to-cover reader since 1974 and extend my best wishes to all of you.
Paul M Latham, via email

 

Lost tango in Paris

I would like to extend my appreciation to Richard Williams for his excellent interview with Bernie Ecclestone (December issue).

Just one point; I thought he might have quizzed Mr E a little more deeply about the relationship Formula 1 has with the FIA. Over many years, Europe has played an indisputable role in helping F1 build its worldwide success. Would it not be better for the sport if the FIA did not find itself, apparently, quite so powerless?

It seems wrong that any sporting authority can be told where its own world championship will, or will not, be run.
Mike Knight, Ascot, Berks


Write to: Motor Sport, 18-20 Rosemont Road, London NW3 6NEPlease include your full name and address when corresponding.