The Indianapolis 500-Mile Race (May 30th)

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Since the demise of front-wheel-drive cars at Indianapolis at the end of the nineteen-forties, the Frank Kurtis-inspired “Roadster” has held sway in the annual 500-mile race, and for matter in most other American track races. This type of car was what Europe used to consider conventional, with a big engine at the front driving the rear wheels, and having long low lines not unlike the 1939 Grand Prix cars. Further successful developments on this theme came from A. J. Watson, whose cars have won at Indianapolis for a number of years now.

Last year Mickey Thompson introduced a successful and promising challenge in the form of a rear-engined, all independently sprung car on modern European lines, using a highly tuned production V8 engine of push-rod o.h.v. design. This year the conventional Indianapolis “Roadster” received a rude shock, for two Lotus cars similar to Grand Prix cars but powered by V8 Ford engines, supplied by the Detroit Engine Division, and driven by Jim Clark and Dan Gurney, not only provided a serious challenge throughout training and qualifying, but lay first and second for quite a time, and then were second and fourth until near the end of the race when an unforeseen pit-stop dropped Gurney back to seventh place, where he finished, Clark still being second. That the Lotus-Ford V8 could finish second, on the same lap as the leader after 200 laps, on its very first attempt at Indianapolis, and driven by a driver who was trying track-racing for the first time, needs little comment other than great admiration for all concerned.

By concentrating on light weight and using straight petrol, as against larger and heavier cars using alcohol fuel, the Lotus was able to go the 500 miles with only one pit-stop for petrol and tyres, against the “Roadsters” three stops. Under the same conditions and with more experience there is little doubt that Team Lotus, backed by Ford (U.S.A.), could win Indianapolis with ease, but it is unlikely that the American teams will sit back and watch this happen next year.

Results:

Indianapolis 500—May 30th—200 laps of rectangular track with slightly banked corners

1st: R. Parnell-Jones (Willard Battery Spec.: 4.2-litre Offenhauser 4-cyl.) – 143.137 m.p.h. (record speed)
2nd: J. Clark (Lotus-Ford: 4.2-litre Ford V8) – 142.752 m.p.h.
3rd: A. J. Foyt (Thompson Spec.: 4.2-litre Offenhauser 4-cyl.) – 142.210 m.p.h.
4th: R. Ward (Leader Card Spec.: 4.2-litre Offenhauser 4-cyl.).
5th: D. Branson (Leader Card Spec.: 4.2-litre Offenhauser 4-cyl.).
6th: J. McElreath (Forbes Spec.: 4.2-litre Offenhauser 4-cyl.).

33 starters — 16 finishers

You may also like

Related products