What would Sir William think?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

The new XJ fulfils the Lyons ethos of a luxury saloon, but he might question the industry’s progress
By Andrew Frankel

It is self-evident that cars get better. I become mildly exercised when I read proclamations that any new car is the best its manufacturer has yet produced because to me the only thing worth reading in this regard would be if it were not. That’s progress.

Sometimes, however, manufacturers slip back. Historically Ferrari has proven rather good at this, replacing the lovely 328 with the awful 348, or the wondrous F355 with the overrated F360. F40 to F50 wasn’t exactly a step in the right direction either.

But it is Jaguar that has shown the most concerning mastery of this art over the years. Look what happened with the E-type over its lifetime, or the original XKs from the svelte 120 to the bloated 150. But it is the XJ I’m going to dwell on here.

Just before driving this all-new XJ, I was able to spend a couple of hours in an original, 1968 Mk1 XJ6 – Sir William Lyons’ daily transport no less and a pleasure that had hitherto eluded me. I was only meant to be gone for 30 minutes or so but it is remarkable how easy it is to get lost in France when in a car you don’t want to give back. I thought the old girl’s performance was quite good, its handling less woolly than expected and its interior charm personified. But it was its ride quality that left me gasping: if today you wanted to drive a new car with a comparable ability to soak up and smooth away small, everyday bumps and ripples, I think you’d have to fork out for a Phantom. I’m not joking. In this regard if no other over the past 42 years the industry has taken a massive leap. Backwards.

But it was only when I eased from the oldest XJ to the newest that I mourned most the passing of this art. The blunt truth is that even by modern standards the new XJ’s ride is entirely unremarkable, and by those set by Jaguar over four decades ago, it is lamentable.

Of course it’s like that for a reason. Jaguar could soften up the springs, ease off the dampers and use tyres equipped with old-fashioned things called sidewalls and I am sure this XJ could be made to ride beautifully. But the marketing people, gimlet eyes firmly fixed on the thrusting types they hope will buy the XJ and help Jaguar shed its superannuated image, would not wear it. These days it seems that all cars, even long-wheelbase Jaguar limousines, have to feel sporting.

It’s a shame because this is the one truly bum note the new XJ sounds. When it first started to appear at motor shows it looked strange and a little awkward, but just like the XK coupé, it’s a car whose style only becomes apparent when seen in its natural environment: on the move on the open road. There, and from the front and side at least, its looks are captivating.

Yet the interior is better still. There is a sense of occasion inside the XJ you’ll not find in any Audi, Mercedes or BMW. Theirs is a functional, almost industrial approach with luxury trappings used as appliqués: you know it’s a luxury car because all that wood, chrome and leather says it is. But Jaguar has created an ambience whose luxury seems designed into its very shapes, not tacked onto its surfaces, and therefore brings an authenticity that would require you to go shopping in the Rolls/Bentley end of the market to match.

Nor is there anything retro about its design. Car manufacturers often struggle to find the correct balance between their past and future, allowing the former merely to inform the latter, and it’s a task Jaguar has failed at more than most. Not only has it been shackled to its past, but as cars like the disastrous S-type and previous XJ showed, it wasn’t even any good at doing what it had done before. Now the XJ looks in the only direction any truly worthy Jag has ever looked, and that is exclusively forward.

There are three different engine tunes available for the putative XJ buyer: a 5-litre petrol model with and without supercharging and a 3-litre diesel with sequential turbocharging. What it lacks is a small-capacity petrol model which you and I aren’t going to miss much but whose absence is going to decimate the XJ’s potential in critical markets like China. Apparently Jaguar is working on it.

Of those engines you can buy, only the diesel makes real sense. The V8s are quick, the blown one flashingly so, thanks as much to the aluminium XJ’s low weight as its power, but when even the diesel will hit 60mph from rest in 5.9sec you really are heading deep into the world of diminishing marginal returns if for some reason you need more shove than that. Consider this: the diesel motor will return over 40mpg, the petrol less than 25mpg, even in normally aspirated form. That’s a huge price to pay for knocking around a second off your 0-60mph time and almost 300 miles from the car’s potential range on a single tank of fuel. You might want to consider also that a tax disc for the diesel costs £200, compared to a rather more bracing £435 for either petrol model.

I drove the XJ hard and fast, covering 200 miles across France in little more than three hours without resorting to autoroutes and, ride issues aside, it felt to me as I had always hoped a modern luxury Jaguar saloon would. This is a truly effortless car, entirely at ease both cruising down a dual carriageway and sprinting through the lanes between villages, and it will become better still when sometime in the next year Jaguar replaces its extant six-speed automatic transmission with an eight-speed gearbox they’d rather you didn’t know about just yet.

Yet still its mediocre ride irks. Jaguars in general and XJs in particular should breathe and not bludgeon their way down the road. There’s no doubt that the iron will of its firm dampers brings a level of primary ride control no former XJ would recognise and that’s a good thing when you’re door-handling it across France with no one sitting next to you. Where I fear this approach will fall down is the perhaps more representative environment of the British motorway network with either clients, colleagues or family on board who may fail to appreciate its incisive turn-in and impressive grip as much as you.

Happily there is more than enough that is good about the XJ for this not to be its undoing. How good is it? For as many years as I can remember the S-class Mercedes has ruled this class and I’d say the Jag was just a fraction less capable – but, if subjectivity were allowed a say in such judgements, even more desirable. As good now as Sir William’s visionary masterpiece was back in 1968? Probably not. But as a credible and capable Jaguar saloon with not just the ability but also the charm to help support the company’s recovery over many years to come, it should do just fine.

Jaguar XJ
Engine: supercharged V8 5000cc
Power/Torque: 510bhp @ 6500rpm; 461lb ft at 2500-5500rpm
Gearbox: six-speed automatic
Tyres (20ins): f: 245/40 R20, and r: 275/35 R20
Fuel/CO2: 23.4 mpg, 12.1 per km (petrol)
Acceleration: 0-60mph in 4.7sec (petrol)
Suspension: air suspension with active damper system, f: unequal wishbones; r: lightweight cast aluminium multi-links
Brakes: ventilated discs all round, f: 355mm; r: 326mm, electric parking brake
Top Speed: 155mph
Price: SWB £88,000; LWB £91,000