Matters of Moment, July 2012

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

On the Monday morning after a Grand Prix, it’s become a habit to check out the comments posted by readers under our website race reports. At a glance, it’s a great measure of how the talking points of the day have been assessed, debated and dissected by our knowledgeable – and growing – online community.

Now, clicking through to some forums and comments sections on all manner of websites can be like lifting the lid on a nest of vipers, and if you choose to disturb the mass of seething opinion by sticking your own hand in, be prepared for a nasty bite! The levels of bravery behind a pseudonym and home computer keyboard are breathtaking.

Fortunately our online friends tend to keep things in perspective, and debates are mostly good-natured and respectful. And as they often show a deft turn of phrase, please forgive me as I plunder!

An exchange following the Spanish Grand Prix caught my eye: about Michael Schumacher’s inept launch into the rump of Bruno Senna’s Williams, John Miller was moved to write about the “hilarious comments from the Pot driving into the rear of the Kettle”, prompting Adrian Muldrew to respond: “funniest sporting aphorism I’ve heard since the time Brian Clough thumped a supporter who invaded the pitch, provoking Jimmy Greaves to observe that it was the irst time he’d actually seen the s**t hitting the fan!” Made us chuckle, that one.

Overall, the tone of our readers’ comments was of good cheer for both Williams and Pastor Maldonado, and we speak with one voice on this one. When we published our tribute to the career of Patrick Head in the March issue earlier this year, it’s hardly a stretch to say that, privately, none of us expected to see Williams win another race – ever. Last year had been so awful for this much-loved team, it had fallen so far, that such a recovery seemed inconceivable.

But in that issue, Rob Widdows ended our retrospective by looking ahead to the new season with new chief operations engineer Mark Gillan. Within that interview Gillan explained that the banning of exhaust-blown diffusers was a “signiicant change” and went on to say “now we have certainty in the regulations, and better mapping potential with the Renault engine, and we can still have some blowing – through a much more convoluted path – to get the exhaust gases back to where we want them on the loor of the car. With the Renault package we’ve been able to look again at every aspect of the car, the integration of the engine into the whole drive-train and its mating on to the chassis.”

The wholesale review and new approach has worked, but of course what Gillan couldn’t have known in the depths of last winter was just how critical this new breed of Pirelli tyre would be. Talk about a leveller. Last year, Williams had to start again. Along with Gillan it hired a new technical director, Mike Coughlan, the man whose rehabilitation after his role as a ‘villain’ in the McLaren/Ferrari spy scandal of 2008 is now surely complete. Jason Somerville joined him as head of aerodynamics and Ed Wood continued as chief designer.

Together, they produced the FW34 that has ended the team’s aching eight-year drought – and for that they deserve great credit. So too does Maldonado. Yes, he’s a pay driver, but the backing of the Venezuelan government has secured the team financially and it’s fitting that he should be the one to benefit.

He also happens to be a very good racing driver, better than some of us gave him credit for. You have to be strong to win a GP2 title, but still… he was accident-prone, wasn’t he? Not on Sunday afternoon in Barcelona, he wasn’t.

So can Williams and its 27-year-old lead driver who still wears braces on his teeth really win the world title? On Spanish form, of course. But so much will depend on those Pirellis. What seems likely is that we’ll enjoy some more ‘pinch-me’ moments in what looks set to be the most unpredictable Formula 1 season in years.

Good, solid F1 drivers who would never have had a hope of winning a Grand Prix in previous eras could rack up a hatful, and as for the next race, I don’t think I’ve ever looked forward to a Monaco GP as much. Is it racing for the purists? Well, in Relections Nigel Roebuck compares it to NASCAR, so there’s your answer to that one. Given the magazine you’re reading, you won’t be surprised to hear we have our reservations about the path F1 has taken. But still, as spring turns to summer, we can’t resist. What happens next is anyone’s guess, and that makes for unmissable sport.

This month, we celebrate the 30th anniversary of Group C, an era of sports car racing that will always be close to my heart. Throughout the 1980s, the Brand Hatch 1000Kms was a bright highlight of my season – even when it hissed it down (1983, ‘Del Boy’ and ‘Fitz’ in the J David 956 springs to mind. The mud. It was glorious if you were nine).

By the end of the ’80s, the depth of quality within the World Sportscar Championship, in terms of manufacturers, constructors and drivers, was awesome. I’ll never forget the anticipation before the 1989 Brands race: Jaguar vs Sauber-Mercedes vs Nissan vs Toyota vs Mazda vs the usual multitude of privateer Porsches… It was just too good. And so it would prove when the FIA, with more than a modicum of inluence from that man Bernie, torpedoed the scene by allowing F1 ‘atmo’ engines in. The rules would at least give us the Jaguar XJR-14, the Toyota TS010 and the Peugeot 905 – three wonderful racing cars – but we all knew it was a stupid decision then, and that view hasn’t changed today.

At least now, 20 years later, we’ve inally got a proper world championship back again. On the evidence of the opening European round at Spa (see p24), the new FIA World Endurance Championship is on the right track as a true successor to the spirit of Group C. Give it time. It’s already good – it could be amazing. In closing, allow me to direct you to p44 and details of an online reader survey we are undertaking.

This is your chance to tell us directly what you think about the Green ’Un in 2012: what you like, what you don’t like, what you want more of – and what you’d choose to cut. We’re lucky that Motor Sport’s loyal readers care so much about the magazine that they’re rarely slow to offer their opinions. We listen to every phone call and read every mail and letter. But collectively, surveys are a great chance to make your views count. Magazines that stand still die, and if we are to continue to thrive we need to evolve – but we can’t do it without you. If you can spare the time, I’d be delighted to read your thoughts.

Damien Smith

You may also like

Related products