Indy Split book review: War, what is it good for?

A new book on the battle between CART and IRL is dramatic, comical and, says Simon Arron, surprisingly entertaining

img_46-2.jpg
Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

For contextual reasons, a little background is perhaps required before we examine the latest book from one of America’s foremost motor racing analysts, and occasional Motor Sport contributor John Oreovicz.

I must admit to having almost zero interest in politics. In the UK, this is partly because Westminster seems to have become a toxic playground for the terminally incapable – but even before then I found it hard to get excited about some of those involved. And it’s the same when power struggles break out in the parochial business of motor racing. At the heart of the FISA/FOCA conflict in the early 1980s, I’d read a couple of paragraphs in the specialist weeklies to see who was patronising whom, and why, then despair: “Please stop bickering; just get on with the bloody racing…”

img_46-1.jpg

Tony George, founder of the Indy Racing League and a chief protagonist in the split

In which light, a 432-page book about schisms within the American single-seater mainstream should have been reviewed by almost anybody else. And yet…

It helps that Oreovicz is a very fine writer, of course, but this is by no means as dry as its central motif might suggest.

It is 25 years since CART (Championship Auto Racing Teams) and the newly formed Indy Racing League went head to head and carved American single-seater racing in two. That peaked on May 26, 1996, when CART ran its US 500 at Michigan on the same day that the IRL staged its annual 500-mile showpiece at Indianapolis. CART appeared to hold most of the aces – Penske and Newman/Haas foremost among the teams, Paul Tracy, Al Unser Jr, Michael Andretti, Bobby Rahal and a couple of Fittipaldis within the cast of drivers. Indy had a few ex-F1 veterans, not least Michele Alboreto and Eddie Cheever, but those such as Racin Gardner, Tyce Carlson and Billy Boat weren’t ever likely to become household names. Viewed from afar – specifically on cable TV at a brasserie in Pau, where a section of the European racing community had gathered for the annual street race – it appeared to be a masterclass in self-destruction.

It would be a few years before any CART team bought the required kit (the series ran to different regulations) to return to Indy. Ganassi broke the mould in 2000, winning the race with Juan Pablo Montoya, and a trickle eventually became a stampede. Oreovicz: “Montoya, who had never been around the Brickyard in a racing car, raised a few eyebrows with his apparent indifference toward the historic venue after hitting 217mph on his fourth flying lap during an April test. ‘When I thought of racing in the United States, I thought of CART – not the Indianapolis 500,’ he commented. ‘So far, it’s been very simple to get around here’…”

Very Montoya, that…

It would be 2008, however, before the CART series was finally extinguished and American single-seater racing had a reunited focal point, by which stage NASCAR had moved well ahead in the ratings.

But this is not simply a book about that split and its consequences. It covers pretty much the whole history of Indycar racing, not in terms of detailed race reports but with a stroll through the events, plots and subplots that have shaped it.

The background detail fluctuates between the dramatic –a fatal gunfight involving IMS official and former racer Elmer George, his estranged wife and her new boyfriend, for instance – to the mildly comical. In 1979, when CART was formed and American single-seater racing had previously divided itself in two (albeit relatively briefly), teams committed to the new series had to use pick-ups to tow their cars the final few miles to a pre-season test at Phoenix, because floods had washed away most of the main road and regular transporters couldn’t get through.

“This is by no means as dry as its central motif might suggest”

There’s a bit about why promising young racer Jeff Gordon ended up racing stock cars, despite initially harbouring Indy dreams. Linda Conti, whose team gave Gordon a Super Vee test, recalled visiting the CART paddock to discuss opportunities. “AJ Foyt was the only one that spent any amount of time talking with him, and I don’t think Carl Haas even said hello. Jeff was pretty dejected on the ride home. He thought teams might actually want to hire him because he had talent, but Foyt told him, ‘Get the hell away from these assholes and go NASCAR racing. They actually want a driver, not a cheque.’ I never heard Jeff mention the Indy 500 after that.”

There’s also a nice line about one of the reasons CART superstar Rick Mears opted to remain in America, rather than pursuing any F1 aspirations in the slipstream of a successful test with Brabham: “Knowing there was a 7-Eleven on every corner.”

This is a political story with strong human content, an erudite illustration of how sport shouldn’t be run and a cracking good read.

Indy Split book

 

Indy Split 

John Oreovicz 

Octane Press, $27
ISBN 9781642340563


July 2021 book reviews in brief

Stephen South: The way it was

Darren Banks
Warmly received when first published, it swiftly sold out. One of Britain’s most promising young racers of the 1970s, South lost a plum seat with the Toleman F2 team in 1980 after testing an F1 McLaren without telling his employer. He subsequently picked up a Can-Am deal, but his career ended that summer when he suffered devastating leg injuries in a practice accident at Trois-Rivières. This honest, compelling account of a career cut short has now been reprinted. SA

Performance Publishing, £25
ISBN 9780957645028

 

Mud or bust: The birth of rallycross

Jeremy Walton and Peter Osborne
Four-wheel-drive Capris, mud-caked Minis and a Cosworth-powered DAF: this fond look back at the early days of rallycross is nothing if not eclectic. It is proudly personal, rather than wearing ‘official history’ pretensions and all the stronger for it. Compiled from black and white photos from 1969-71 discovered in a dusty garage matched with reports from Motoring News, what the book lacks in gloss it makes up for in vim. A contents list would have been nice but this is an unashamedly agricultural romp through a period of what it calls ‘motorised madness’. JD

fromthedrivingseat.com, £9.99

 

Making a marque

Peter Moss and Richard Roberts
An impressive assemblage of Rolls-Royce advertising from the earliest text-only fliers for the 1904 10HP to romantic images for the 1939 Wraith, comparing approaches in Britain – tradition and privilege – and the US – achievement and success. Claude Johnson’s PR genius is clear, soon cementing RR as “the best”, backed by aristocratic endorsements. Extracts of company minutes show RR spent £15,000 on publicity in 1932 alone in multiple arenas (not Motor Sport!).  A suitably high-quality production offering hours of browsing. GC 

Dalton Watson, £95
ISBN 9781854433107

You may also like

Related products