Russell had written off Miami as just one of those things, a track he admits he has always struggled with, and that he’d be back to his best in Montreal (where he’d been on pole in ’24 and ’25). So the pressure only intensified as Antonelli proved super-quick at Montreal too.
Russell prevailed in qualifying for both the sprint and the main event but he had to think his way to those poles over the swashbuckling, freewheeling audacity of Antonelli. Russell found a better way around the difficulty of bringing the front tyres up to temperature. In final sprint qualifying he opted for the preparation lap, giving more time to let the heat soak through to the tyres’ core, in contrast to Antonelli who had the task of committing on the first attack lap. In final grand prix qualifying the next day Russell abandoned his first run before setting a lap, giving him just enough time to do two attack laps on his second run – and it was on the second the pole lap came.
“Russell had to think his way to those poles over the audacity of Antonelli”
It was the product of formidable performance around a track at which he always shines – and experience-based savvy in challenging circumstances. But he wasn’t actually inherently faster. Antonelli’s progress was eye-catching, up to the absolute edge of the track on corner entry, with the curve of the rear tyre sidewall even hovering above the grass on the entry to the Turn 13 chicane. High risk, but incredible, flowing precision. Russell’s style was less gung-ho but peakier, beautifully co-ordinated in really digging into the grip, which was there once you got the tyre working. But you could see the joins in the corner phases more, the steering more aggressive, the turn-ins often later.
Russell retiring from the lead after 30 laps of flat-out brawling with his team-mate – with contact again being made, Antonelli again complaining of being pushed off – obviously came as a gut blow in leaving him 43 points down on Antonelli, who took a fourth consecutive victory. But just five races in, there are a whole load of points remaining and of more concern than the numerical gap will be the scale of challenge that Antonelli’s performance represents. That was the real psychological blow.