A Granville Bradshaw critic

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,

As one of the minor critics of the claims of the great “GB,” I read Col Bowden’s letter in your May issue (p. 349) with some amusement.

His logic about critics is rather above me, surely I do not have to paint a picture to pass an opinion of one. As to wars being won by high-ranking officers, I thought that the PBI had something to do with them, and even a blind quarter-wit could criticise some of the brilliant decisions of the brass-hats—Paschendale to you, sir.

Col Bowden’s comment, “had normal development been done,” confirms my previous comments. When this development includes resiting oil pumps, redesigning rocker gear, fitting new crankshafts, etc, there seems very little left of the engine design for which to claim merit. I think Col Bowden’s results testify to the efficiency of the army workshops in India and his local mechanic at Porlock. As for the Anec aeroplane taking off without external aid, as an ex-pilot I don’t recall using any rockets or catapults. I was present at the 1923-24 light aeroplane trials and I do not recall any machine that refused to fly.

My own qualifications to pass an opinion on this matter is that at the time in question I ran a motorcycle and car repair shop and several of my customers had these machines—but not for long.

To wind up. May the great “GB” be with us for many more years. When he passes on we shall have to find something else to argue about.

I am, Yours, etc.

“Old Tom” Sevenoaks.  [Name and address supplied.—Ed ]