Readers reply to D.S.J.

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Sir,
I was absolutely amazed to read Denis Jenkinson’s comments on the Ford racing programme in “Continental Notes” in your May edition. I am not sure whether he dislikes Ford because they are American or because they are an extremely large organisation. One would hardly call Daimler-Benz, B.R.M. or Honda small organisations but none of these have been criticised because of the money they have spent on research and development.

The new Ford S-car is referred to disparagingly as a travelling laboratory but I always thought that one of the prime reasons for motor racing was to develop and improve motor cars in general and the great improvement in brakes, tyres, etc., we have seen in recent years is mainly due to racing.

What is even more peculiar is that in the closing paragraphs of the same feature Denis Jenkinson says, with apparent admiration, about the French Matra concern that “… facilities of the whole engineering group can be used for the benefit of the racing department”.

To describe, even jokingly, Ferraris as “home-made specials” seems to me to be insulting. One can only surmise that Denis Jenkinson would like to see racing cars built by poverty-stricken genii in back gardens. These cars. while interesting to their constructors, are hardly likely to make the same contribution to cars in general that large programmes like Ford’s undoubtedly will.

London, S.W.18. Malcolm Millais.

Related articles

Related products