Editorial, June 2000

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Next month’s issue of Motor Sport will, I hope, become one of the more collectable editions. To celebrate fifty years of Formula One and as part of our preview to this year’s Coys Historic Festival we have selected a Grand Prix car from each of the five decades that F1 has been with us, taken them to Silverstone and driven them, back to back, for a day. What’s more, Martin Brundle came to help with the driving. Martin, thank heaven, is a rabid enthusiast, more than capable of appreciating any racing car; it was fascinating to see him hop from a 3.5-litre 1990s F 1 car into a 2-litiv ’50s machine and see him return, grin undiminished. He was also illuminating on the subject of modem F1 or, rather, its drivers and how they compared to those he encountered in his 13 seasons. He was surprised, at first, by my contention that now there is just one driver viewed as a demi-god by the public whereas his career was peppered with the likes of Senna, Prost, Piquet and Mansell. He thought fora while, then ventured the following:

“I guess it’s like the royal family. These days everyone knows what all the drivers are doing all the time; there is data acquisition on every move and you cannot run and hide; then, there was very little exposure and that created a mystique around the top drivers. When I got my first podium in ’84, they pulled a truck up, Piquet, de Angelis and I got on, waved to a few mechanics, wives or girl-friends and that was it. That was the procedure.

“What I absolutely refute, however, is any suggestion that the drivers today are somehow less talented than those who were driving when I was in Fl. It is the way they are portrayed that changes people’s attitudes to them. Maybe now there is too much exposure…”

There may be a number of wondering whether it is going to be worth going to Le Mans this year. Most of the traditional works teams are staying away, after all. Historically, in fact, that is one of the best reasons for going to Le Mans. Works teams do not guarantee good racing; often in the past they have done precisely the reverse. The history of the race is defined by periods of works domination and, often, processional racing. On the other hand, look at the best race of the recent past and you will note there was not a single official works team on the grid. In 1995 various private McLawns GT cars thught through the night with a Courage-Porsche prototype in a truly epic battle. And even amid the mutterings about just how private an entrant the eventual winner was, it was proven that a good Le Mans does not need vast factory efforts behind it. Besides, there is also the new historic Ferrari race before the 24-hours kick-off, and the chance to see the 512s back in their element is not one that I, for one, feel inclined to miss.

You may also like

Related products