F1 Frontline - Mark Hughes

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

Current page

197

Current page

198

As Renault and Honda square up to each other in the battle of the engines, it’s the Japanese firm that appears to have the upper hand

It could hardly have been more embarrassing for McLaren in Bahrain when with Renault power it qualified 13th and 14th as Pierre Gasly in the Toro Rosso-Honda qualified sixth. In just his seventh grand prix, the young Frenchman had qualified his STR13-Honda almost 0.6sec faster than the mighty Fernando Alonso’s McLaren-Renault. He was best of the rest after the big three of Ferrari, Mercedes and Red Bull and went on to finish a resounding fourth in the race, Honda’s best result since returning in 2015. Amusingly, on the slow-down lap, Gasly repeated Alonso’s radio message from Australia of, “Now we can fight.”

McLaren, having paid to exit the Honda contract as well as surrendering the income the Japanese company was providing, was now running a Renault-powered car that seemed to show remarkably similar traits to its Honda-powered predecessor. After a winter of unreliability through insufficient cooling the McLaren at Bahrain was by far the slowest car through the speed trap – just as it used to be when it had a Honda in the back. Furthermore, the speed gain when DRS was used was significantly more than anyone else was finding, suggesting that more drag was being dumped. Which in turn suggested that at least some of what Honda used to get blamed for at McLaren was probably rooted in the drag of the McLaren. Which would also have been a factor in the poor economy – and in Bahrain Alonso allowed himself to be lapped at the end so as to save a lap’s worth of fuel while Gasly was adamant that fuel consumption had barely been a concern.

It was a slightly unfair freeze-frame comparison in that the McLaren was much more competitive than the Toro Rosso in the preceding race at Melbourne and the subsequent one in China. But the progress in both the speed and reliability of the Honda power unit this year is very real – and the working relationship with Red Bull’s junior team is vastly better and more open than ever it was with McLaren.

Throughout Honda’s three-year return with McLaren, it always seemed the junior partner. It wanted to enter in 2016 after a further year of development but McLaren insisted otherwise. It would have preferred to have given itself more space in the first year with an all-new, very complex engine technology, but McLaren insisted it must be ‘size zero’ to maximise aerodynamic performance. It was as if Honda was expected to get straight up to the speed in every aspect, which was an unreasonable expectation.

To minimise the external dimensions the original engine featured the turbine and compressor between the vee of the engine. As electrical efficiencies of the new era of turbo electric hybrids improved, so such a layout was revealed as obsolete. The greater those efficiencies, the bigger a turbine that could be justified. Mercedes led the way and into year two of its programme was already using turbines that could never have been squeezed between the vee. Until Honda abandoned that architecture it was never going to be able to run turbos big enough to give competitive power. 

So, the basic architecture of the engine was fundamentally changed and the 2017 engine featured a Mercedes-type layout, with the turbine outside the vee at the back, split from the compressor at the front of the engine. That’s when the big gains were expected – and hence the massive disappointment when the motor proved disastrously unreliable and under-powered. Partly it was to do with a vibration issue that prevented the turbo and MGU-H from running at its design speed – a problem that Honda felt could have been alleviated had there been a little more space available within the installation. But the faith had been lost by this time.

What has been in the back of the Toro Rosso so far this year is a modified version of that 2017 engine with a further upgrade made to the MGU-H after the first race. In race trim its peak power is 12bhp down on the Renault (that’s still over 40bhp adrift of Mercedes and Ferrari). An all-new engine under development (with different heads and block) is due to arrive in Montréal for which an extra 20kW (27bhp) is promised.

What we don’t yet know is whether Honda’s reluctance to use the MGU-H as a relay from the ERS-K to the battery (where there is no regulation limit) has been abandoned. Although the MGU-H can recapture exhaust gas energy, the other engine makers have found more from prioritising it as an electrical relay between the ERS-K (capturing kinetic energy from braking) and the battery. Honda did not follow this practice initially – which could be because its electrical efficiencies were poor (i e it lost too much energy in transferring) or because there was some limitation caused by the mechanical design of the K.

This typically would be revealed by the Honda running out of electrical deployment early on the straights. That aspect seems to have been improved – even in Shanghai, where the Toro Rosso was not particularly competitive, it was second only to the Mercedes in terminal speed at the end of the 1km back straight. Slowest was McLaren. That could partly be a function of lack of downforce – and therefore drag – on the part of the Toro Rosso. But even a low-drag car would need the extra electrical deployment (around 160bhp) not to cut out early if it was to reach such terminal velocities. At the time of writing we were about to head to Baku which features the longest stretch of flat-out running seen during the season. This will be the ultimate test of deployment.

Watching all this with great interest is Red Bull. With a foot in both the Honda and Renault camps it’s in a unique position for comparison. So far what is has observed of Honda is a level of commitment, open mindedness and rate of improvement exceeding that of Renault. As things stand, it would be a surprise if the senior Red Bull team was not Honda-powered in 2019 and beyond.    

Since he began covering Grand Prix racing in 2000, Mark Hughes has forged a reputation as the finest Formula 1 analyst of his generation

You may also like

Related products