Case for nationalisation ?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Sir,

I have a 1937 Riley Monaco. It is not, I must admit, anything to write to Motor Sport  about. I have not owned it long enough to be able to claim any outstanding performances and, apart from a pretty little “mod.” on the tail, there is nothing outstanding about the car.

It has acquired some distinction, however. It is the first car I have owned on which I have been refused insurance, and my past is strewn with enough superannuated saloons and misbegotten two-seaters to stock a small breaker’s yard.

There was a 1929 Singer which always caught fire on Tuesday afternoons; a 1931 Morris Minor which didn’t know its right from its left; a Model Y Ford which collapsed under me after two years of dreadful hack work; and a 1939 8-h.p. saloon which darted about the road like a Mexican jumping bean when one steered it straight, and rolled murderously when one cornered above 18 m.p.h. All these, and several more, underwriters fought to insure and, except for two trivial damage claims, they did nothing but give me a receipt for my money.

Now, when for the first time I have a car which is in first-cass order throughout, I am turned away. Insurance company No. 1 made me pay a guinea for an engineer’s report, which said that two spokes were loose in a front wheel and there was slight play in a steering ball joint, and then turned me down flat. Insurance company No. 2 is insisting on having these very serious faults remedied and will then, I understand, consider taking me on, subject to various other undertakings. I am hoping to be allowed to drive the car sometimes…

My brokers, who are as angry with firm No. 1 (a Lloyd’s syndicate) as I am, tell me that underwriters have taken a beating on car accounts lately. Evidently, the blancmange shapes you mentioned last month and the multi-millionaires who drive them are proving expensive. But it seems to me that you and I and everyone who drives a pre-war car are going some way towards bearing the burden. Insurance company No. 2 has not yet been sordid enough to discuss the cost of underwriting my 1937 death-trap. They need not; they have the law on their side and I must pay a king’s ransom to any company who will deign to exact it. Without being political, is it not time the Government provided the cover the law demands and put an end to this legalised blackmail?

I am, Yours etc.,

Maurice Landergan,

London, S.E.1.

Related articles

Related products