New or secondhand-That is the question?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Sir,
I always enjoy reading through the Letters from Readers part of Motor Sport each month, and especially the unbiased remark, both for and against any particular car. I cannot help but feel rather smug when I read about a new car that has two engines in 11,000 miles. or four rear axles in 8,000 miles, of water in the boot, broken gearboxes, clutches that do not work, electrics that go wrong, and so on. Last summer I covered 30.000 miles on the Continent and used for the purpose a 1938 car, bought from a reputable trader in London and used for 2,000 miles in England before setting off for foreign parts. During the mileage I covered, which included everything from mountain tracks to autobahns and at a general overall running average of 40-45 m.p.h., I never failed to reach my destination on any occasion, except when I returned to London and was within a mile of Earls Court; then a rocker-shaft bolt broke and, had it not dropped down into the timing drive, I could have effected a roadside repair.

The only replacements I needed in 30,000 miles in this “umpteenth-hand ” car were engine bearer springs, which broke every 10,000 miles, replacement taking 15 minutes, a prop.-shaft coupling, a set of friction shock-absorber discs, a rear torsion-bar that broke due to running without a shock-absorber on 2,000 miles of bumpy roads, and four new exhaust valves when the engine was decoked at 20,000 miles. On the electric side both the dynamo and starter had new brushes shortly after the decoke mileage, and no bulbs or wires were even looked at. The clutch has never needed adjustment, while the brakes have been taken up three times, and I still do 30 m.p.g. of petrol and 3,000 m.p.g. of oil, the odometer reads well over 80,000 miles (the driver’s door has just begun to rattle), and the engine was rebored +30 thousandths of an inch some time before my ownership, during the 40,000-mile era. Due to not hanging about around the corners or over bad roads, the tyres wear out regularly in 14,000 miles, but they are 14,000 miles of enjoyable dicing with never an anxious moment, wet or dry, and I have cracked two road wheels under the stresses of a static degree of understeer, while the lightness of all the controls when returning to the car after grappling with Girling, Lockheed, Borg and Beck, Burman Douglas, Lucas, or any other specialist that helps the British motor industry, makes one think that something has become uncoupled.

This is no wonder car that I write about, just a family saloon made for the populace of Italy some 17 years ago and still used by the “funny English who love old cars”—what is it ? Why, a perfectly standard 1938 Lancia Aprilia.

If it now falls about my ears in a thousand pieces and I have to give it away, it will only represent a loss of 3d. a mile.

I am, Yours, etc.,

Odiham. “D,S.J”.

Related articles

Related products