Fidelity

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Sir,

Recently on television and in the Press the Motor Agents’ Association Fidelity Scheme was painted in glowing colours.

I have no doubt that a great deal of good work has been done by this body, but I’m afraid my personal experience is not entirely in line with these reports. In June, 1963, I wrote to the M.A.A. giving details of unsatisfactory work carried out on my car by a local garage which was a member of the Fidelity scheme. This consisted of an exchange crankshaft, new pistons, and all associated auxiliaries. The gudgeon-pin on one cylinder “floated” due to a slack clamping bolt and scored the cylinder deeply, also causing damage to the crankshaft.

It was September 13th before an examination of the engine was carried out at my insistence, thus enabling me to replace the damaged engine, the car lying idle from June to September, causing considerable inconvenience and financial loss. From September 13th to the present date I have had no further communications from the Fidelity Scheme despite three letters from myself requesting progress details in my claim against the garage.

As you will appreciate, my opinion of the Fidelity Scheme is not very high since the inconvenience and financial loss could have been minimised simply by replacing the engine at my own cost immediately and accepting the bad workmanship. I would be interested to learn if any reader has had a similar experience.

C. HAMEL.

TyIdesley.