Radar

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

From Lord Howe

Sir,

Since I believe that I was one of the first to attack the use of the radar speed meter by the Buckinghamshire police and opposed its purchase in the early stages, I was interested to read Mr. N. J. Pugh’s letter in the January issue of Motor Sport. I have received numerous letters supporting my views and a few, very few, in opposition, so it is not unreasonable to suppose that the majority are opposed to the use of radar speed meters. Mr. Pugh in his very sensible letter puts a question to himself as to whether these radar meters are unreliable; my answer is that they certainly can be. From my own personal experience under demonstration by as much as 9 m.p.h. and, on questioning the police operator, the reply was “I cannot understand it, the equipment was carefully tested and proved accurate before demonstration.”

It is obvious to me that it cannot be used satisfactorily, with a lot of traffic passing through the beam in different directions the needle on the meter flicks all over the dial. I am not surprised that it takes at least a sec. to right itself after a reading before another reading can be taken.

My main objection is to the principle involved in all this, as a magistrate I know only too well the time taken by the Court in dealing with these speeding offences, surely it would be far more helpful to all concerned if the police were to show some warning signs that these radar meters were in operation on certain roads, then any motorists or motor-cyclists trapped would only have themselves to blame and the number of cases before the Court would be reduced. Unless a warning notice is put up, it seems as if the police are keen to trap the motorist instead of trying to prevent him or her from committing a speeding offence. The Chief Constable of Buckinghamshire has said that “he will not be difficult and will play the game.” I recommend the above to him. I sympathise with the Editor of Motor Sport when he says “what a racket the thing has become.”

Howe – Gstaad.

You may also like

Related products