Ergonomics

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,

I wonder if I could beg a little of your splendid correspondence columns to congratulate December correspondent D. R. Kelsey on his most timely letter about switch ergonomics. Surely every thinking reader must agree with his outspoken condemnation of steering column stalks for lamps and wipers. As we know well, Continental cars have had these for many years and now our own car designers are following their fashion: Sheep!

Originally these controls were designed to suit the limited ability of Continental peasan try who obviously lacked the physical and mental stamina of even the most mediocre British driver. Judging by the design of these column stalks, foreigners neither have the ability to distinguish between closely or randomly placed identical dashboard switches, nor the physical attributes to keep reaching out to operate them. In fact the unfortunate continentals evidently have so little ability that they feel uncomfortable unless they can keep their hands on the steering wheel, using only their finger-tips to operate two or three levers. You can well imagine the results:

Firstly the drivers of such cars rapidly lose their sense of directional judgement, which in most British cars is maintained by arranging the switches in a programmed self-teaching arrangement. This ensures that if you are stupid enough to forget exactly where the right switch is in an emergency, you get a nasty fright or, even more elucidating, an accident. This is probably the best known method of keeping a driver’s directional judgement up to scratch.

Secondly, by placing the switches out of easy reach, the stomach and back muscles are kept continually toned up. Fitness is most important in these days of coronary troubles due to lack of exercise.

Thirdly, by placing the switches within easy reach, the continental’s driving alertness slowly deteriorates because he is able to minimise his risk of injury in an accident by wearing a tightly adjusted static seat-belt, which in many UK cars is impossible because of the control positions. This is another way of reducing awareness because, as was pointed out recently, the inertia reelbelt, so necessary in many British cars, is not as safe as the static belt at preventing injuries, and therefore makes the driver more alert to avoiding such risks. Better still, no belts at all is the best way of ensuring constant driver vigilance.

And finally I’m surprised Mr. Kelsey didn’t remark on the other related feature at which fortunately Britain still leads Europe, namely in the amount of leg-room provided for drivers. By carefully restricting the fore and aft travel of driving seats, most popular British cars ensure that probably a quarter of all drivers cannot attain a comfortable driving position. This is a fourth and most valuable feature in keeping drivers alert, as was recognised publicly by Sir Alec Issigonis many years ago.

Personally I wouldn’t be without my new Chrysler Hunter which embodies all that is best in Mr. Kelsey’s philosophy. The light switch is fourteen inches from the wheel rim —even better than a Mini’s—and grouped with several similar ones; the wiper control is only ten inches beyond but makes up for the inadequate distance by being behind and under the wheel—very subtle design there. First and third gears require a firm forward stretch and the steering wheel requires very large wheel movements which is excellent for keeping my arms and shoulders fit. And finally the driving seat does not go far enough back to allow me to relax into a a dangerously comfortable position, which puts the ultimate touch to the carefully devised package at ensuring alertness and fitness. My word, those Chrysler stylists really learnt something from the errors of the steering column controls of the original Imp and current Avenger. I suggest that the Hunter is probably the ultimate in Mr. Kelsey’s philosophy and I must say I’m surprised he doesn’t own one.

However, I’m sorry to say that these insidious continental ideas are slowly brainwashing the British public. My local dealer tells me that people are actually beginning to complain about these “alertness” features: Apparently more than one driver in five, has the nerve to gripe about the lack of leg-room alone, which just shows how far this decadence has spread. Fortunately most British car makers seem to realise this danger and use a carefully devised system whereby dealers are trained not to relay complaints from the public, and if they do (inadvertently) the complaints are automatically routed to dead files. I also understand that they are strongly resisting the introduction of ergonomics—the devilish science which seems to be the cause of all this trouble—by a crafty pretence that they know all about it.

Keep up the good work Mr. Kelsey. Let’s all tell these car designers where their errors lie and help preserve the British pedigree. Long live a thinking and independent Britain.

Crick C. R. Smith

You may also like

Related products