Greasy fields

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,

I am writing because I fear that we may all be concerned over the same issue. That is, possible changes in public liability laws which may come into being as part of the current drive for single standards across Europe.

These possible changes in the rules alarm me as a fan of grasstrack motorsport, as they could effectively end it in this country.

It is considered that the average oval stock car track could need a 10ft high fence around it to protect the public. However, since most grass tracks are temporary facilities, situated in farmers’ fields, and the construction of such a fence would need the consent of the local planning permission committee. This, in turn, would change the usage of the land from a farmer’s field to something else, ie a permanent race track.

I fear that most clubs would be unable to remain open. due to the lack of both permission and funds.

This could effect such sports as stock car racing, hillclimbing, trials driving, banger racing, motocross, trials riding, grass track speedway, sprinting and many other forms of racing.

Such activities occupy huge numbers of people in a positive and enjoyable hobby. It would be a terrible waste to see it all forced into extinction by Eurocrats.

I have written to several MPs (some of whom are members of the House of Commons Motor Club, and are hopefully on racing’s side) about this matter, to enlist their support in resisting these changes. I have yet to hear their opinions on this issue, but I hope that all branches of the sport will be aware of the possible changes and will try to stop any new rules which could be detrimental to amateur motorsport.

R Peter Cook, Selsdon, Surrey.

You may also like

Related products