Editorial, March 2000

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

There seems to be considerable debate surrounding how much Jaguar should lean on its heritage during its foray into Formula One.

There are those who think it scandalous that Jaguar’s in Fl at all, particularly as it is at the expense of the house of Stewart and all it’s achieved in the last 35 years. They say this is badge engineering at its worst as the cars will never go to Coventry. These people would also, I guess, decry the recovery of Aston Martin and products such as the DB7 Vantage for similar reasons. The truth is that iflaguar had not been bought by a multinational, there would be no badge left to engineer, and the same surely can be said of Lotus, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Bentley, Alfa-Romeo, Maserati and, I expect, another little outfit called Ferrari.

And while these mean-minded individuals snipe at those whose only sin is to save great names from certain death, perhaps they should spare a moment’s thought for what, in fact, is the real issue here. Heritage is not a static entity, it is a constantly moving concept, fed not by retrospection but forward thinking. We may get misty eyed over a D-type Jaguar but the reason it won races and thereby created the heritage is that it was, at the finite, the most advanced sportscar the world had ever seen.

It is true the move to F1 is brave and you need only look at Aston’s dalliance in 1960 to know that making great sportscars in no way guarantees even modest success in F1. But in another way it is also clever. Clever because it leaves Aston to return to Le Mans but more clever as no-one expects *guar to win a Grand Prix. IfJaguar went back to Le Mans, the only news would be Wit didn’t win, and that’s a burden anyone would be smart to avoid.

Most clever of all is that if all Jaguar achieves in its first season is to do no better than Stewart did in its last, then it will win a Formula One Grand Prix. And that, let me tell those who still doubt the wisdom if this move, will create more pure heritage for the marque than it would gain by winning every sportscar race on the calendar.

Of course, this is not Jaguar’s first F1 outing. Fifty years ago Jaguar power joined that of Ferrari and AlfaRomeo at the 1950 Italian GE The reason this little known truth is not trumpeted around Coventry right now? Well, while the engine was Jaguar’s, it was inside Clemente Biondetti’s Ferrari 166 Special. It qualified on the last row of the grid and blew up before one quarter distance. Here’s hoping for better things this time around.

We are resting our regular ‘My Greatest Race’ column. In its place, the world’s greatest racing car designers will nominate the machine they most wish they had created themselves. Patrick Head kicks it off on page 90.

Related articles

Related products