F-type: fact or fiction?

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that, with Jaguar under new ownership, once more the rumour mill is gearing up for another one of its sessions predicting the imminent arrival of the car hitherto known as the F-type.

This has been a sporadic occurrence for over 30 years now and, despite concept cars and any number of fuzzy scoop shots, it has yet to result in something the public can go out and buy. So forgive me if I don’t immediately take as gospel the current confection of speculation and off-the-record briefings, peppered somewhat inevitably by large sprinklings of wishful thinking, that the F-type is once more on the cards.

Besides, the last time there was any substance behind the speculation it still all came to nothing. You may remember that back in 1978 Pininfarina showed a concept car in London called the XJ Spider. It was very beautiful, very clearly styled to succeed the E-type (which had died just three years previously) and set a public still reeling from the awful ugliness of the XJS clamouring for its introduction.

That was never likely, but it did at least help persuade Jaguar that a modern E-type would be a desirable and, indeed, saleable car. Work started in the 1980s on what would have become the F-type and proceeded a long way, far enough at least for many fully functioning prototypes to be built, some of which still exist under dust covers in a quiet corner of Jaguar headquarters. Inside Jaguar it was known as XJ41 and, at first, it looked very promising. Then a rot, well known within the British motor industry at the time, set in. Like the similarly stillborn XJ13 racing car of the 1960s, the F-type was delayed and delayed again. Then it needed to be made safer which delayed it some more and made an already heavy car heavier still. Then the company was sold to Ford, which had also bought Aston Martin, a marque in even greater need of a new sports car than Jaguar. In short, the bare bones of the XJ41 project were given to Tom Walkinshaw who, in turn, brilliantly transformed this less than prepossessing raw material into the DB7. Jaguar got nothing.

So why believe anything will come of the current crop of hearsay, when there is no physical and not even that much circumstantial evidence available? Indeed the more obvious arguments seem to support a case against building an E-type successor.

First, and most seriously, where is the money going to come from? Now Jaguar is no longer owned by Ford, it cannot adapt a pre-existing platform as it did with the X-type (Mondeo) and S-type (Lincoln LS). So unless Jaguar enters into a strategic alliance with a major manufacturer, such as Aston Martin is rumoured shortly to do with Mercedes-Benz, Tata will have to build the car from scratch, which some have suggested would be a ruinous exercise for a company that’s already placed the begging bowl on the doorstep of No 10.

The other problem faced by Jaguar is that if this putative F-type is indeed a smaller, more affordable, more sporting coupé and roadster than the current XK, then it will have to wade into battle against some very able, well-established opposition. This has not always been the case. The brilliance of the Porsche Boxster, which unquestionably saved that company in the mid-1990s, was not its engineering or looks (both of which were pretty average even at the time), but the fact that it filled a gaping hole in the market. At the time of its introduction there was neither Audi TT nor Mercedes SLK, and while the BMW Z3 and MGF did just beat it into the showrooms, they were much more downmarket and affordable products. But the F-type would have to compete squarely against Porsche, Audi, Mercedes and BMW’s soon-to-be-renewed Z4.

And yet, despite it all, I feel inclined to believe such a car is a more likely proposition now than at any time in the last 20 years. It’s said this is a car Jaguar cannot afford to build: on the contrary, and in the hope you’ll forgive the double negative, I think it’s a car Jaguar cannot afford not to build. It seems clear that Jaguar’s long-term future cannot be secured by the existing model ranges, even though the XF and XK are among the best engineered in the class. But after the sales disasters of the X and S-types, it’s also clear that Jaguar has no future in mass manufacturing. It must exist as a low-volume, high-margin marque, much as did Porsche before it diversified into building vast SUVs.

What better product with which to face that future than a modern E-type? The platform issue can be addressed either by sharing one with its Land Rover sibling, which itself is in desperate need of a more compact offering, or by adapting the unique aluminium monocoque chassis of the XJ, though whether it could manufacture an aluminium F-type profitably is another matter. And as for the competition, if such a car was merely as good as its rivals, but gorgeous to behold and with a Jaguar badge on its nose, I have no doubt at all that it would sell.

When might we see such a car? Even if it were given the go-ahead today, it would take a minimum of three years to design, engineer and prepare for production. But that doesn’t mean we’ll have to wait that long to find out about it. In the spring of 2011, little more than two years from now, the Geneva motor show will mark the 50th anniversary of the day when Jaguar pulled the covers off the prototype E-type and changed the sports car world for ever.

There will never be a better time or place to show the world its successor. The good news is that this is a fact of which those in charge of Jaguar are acutely aware.

Related articles

Related products