I have recently acquired a 1968 Jaguar 420 (S-type) and wonder if any other four/ five-seater four-door saloon of similar vintage can compare with this superb machine for sheer performance, ride comfort and equipment at the price when new of around £2,300? Now, nine years later, I purchased it for less than a quarter of that, and from recent ads. in Motor Sport I think I have an investment-and what an enjoyable investment to drive!
Despite W.B.’s frequent dismissals of the long-stroke 4.2 engine’s merits in the late sixties, on account of its low rev-limit of 5,000 r.p.m., I would venture to suggest that his beloved BMW “sixes” could hardly match the terrific low-speed of 4.2-litre XK unit, which pulls smoothly front below 1,000 r.p.m. and with terrific vigour front 1,500 r.p.m. At high revs my engine feels smooth enough, and I am surprised D.S.J. did not take issue with him over the 4.2s performance at high revs.
Sorry to labour the point, which I know has been discussed before, but I would be very interested in other readers’ experiences with this type of Jaguar, excelled in value-for-money, surely, only by the Standard House product ! Usual disclaimers.
Hornchurch PAUL GARDNER
The next round of the R.A.C. Hill-Climb Championship will be held at Great Auclum on August 12th, organised by the Hants & Berks Motor Club. This should prove to be…
No more shots in the dark?
Is yet more of the Safari Rally's adventuresome spirit about to be diluted? That's certainly the way it looks . . . Very little in the way of information concerning…
Ghosts in the machine
Land speed record tales of Woe are legion, but none is quite so weird, quite so tragic, as that of the 'City of Salt Lake'. Peter Holthusen explains Bonneville Salt…