Should points mean prizes?

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Sir,

I have just read Paul T Hezzell-Moody’s letter in your January issue, expressing the view that the World Championship should be based on number of wins rather than points. He is not the first person to express this view, but he and all the previous exponents have not explained why a wins system is superior to a points system, other than putting forward simplicity, fairness and ease of understanding. These are all desirable but not fundamental reasons for changing the system.

The reason for change is that a points system is intellectually untenable. It purports to establish quantative relationships between placings, when such relationships do not exist. Why is second place worth two-thirds of first place? Why is third place worth two-thirds of second place? And so on. Go for a walk down the pit lane, and ask the drivers whether they would prefer to accumulate eighteen points by two wins, or three second places (those drivers who would be happy with eighteen points by any means at all will be disqualified as informal voters).

The win system is tenable, since it does not set up these quantative relationships, but is based on the primacy of a win. As Paul H-M says, when two (or three or more) drivers have the same number of wins, the number of second places breaks a tie. If they have the same number of second places, count the number of third places. You can count down as far as may be needed to break the tie. Merit does not necessarily vanish after sixth place.

But I suppose this discussion is likely to get us into trouble. If M.Balestre says that second place is worth two-thirds of a win, then we shall all have to apologise to him for daring to disagree.

Mark Taylor

Wanniassa, Australia