Cutting costs

Author

admin

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Sir,

I have read your articles on ways to reduce the cost of Formula One racing cars, and I wonder if you have missed a point? You ask that certain items, such as suspensions (active), and transmissions (semi-automatic) be banned on cost grounds. First, I do not know how much these items cost in comparison to the “normal” items. But, second, whether you realise it or not you are making the Formula One chassis the same as the CART car in the USA. If you continue along this path, we would have a situation whereby Formula One will be using a CART monocoque, and CART will be using Formula One engines. And when that happens the two formulae will merge, which is just what Balestre demanded over the public address at Le Mans in 1988. “It is the desire of my heart to see that on all continents, the three formulas run to three thousand five hundred centimeters.” That is o say F1, CART, Group C, or C1 as it was. So I ask you, is that what you want? This idea was put forward without any qualification as to why this was going to be done. Can you see any advantage? The old duffer managed to kill off Group C in one fell swoop. On a realistic level we cannot just have formulae created, and killed off overnight. Motor racing is expensive enough without making it more so.

What you are saying in your article is that Mercedes-Benz and Connaught should have been banned from the 1955 British Grand Prix because they were the only two cars running with fuel injection. We really should see Formula One kept as open as possible, because that is where the breakthroughs are going to come and reduce the crazy costs of F2, F3, and Sports/ Prototype racing. If CART is forced to use the 3500cc engine, costs will go through the roof.

M Potter,
Aylesbury, Bucks.