Geneva Show stoppers

Browse pages
Current page

1

Current page

2

Current page

3

Current page

4

Current page

5

Current page

6

Current page

7

Current page

8

Current page

9

Current page

10

Current page

11

Current page

12

Current page

13

Current page

14

Current page

15

Current page

16

Current page

17

Current page

18

Current page

19

Current page

20

Current page

21

Current page

22

Current page

23

Current page

24

Current page

25

Current page

26

Current page

27

Current page

28

Current page

29

Current page

30

Current page

31

Current page

32

Current page

33

Current page

34

Current page

35

Current page

36

Current page

37

Current page

38

Current page

39

Current page

40

Current page

41

Current page

42

Current page

43

Current page

44

Current page

45

Current page

46

Current page

47

Current page

48

Current page

49

Current page

50

Current page

51

Current page

52

Current page

53

Current page

54

Current page

55

Current page

56

Current page

57

Current page

58

Current page

59

Current page

60

Current page

61

Current page

62

Current page

63

Current page

64

Current page

65

Current page

66

Current page

67

Current page

68

Current page

69

Current page

70

Current page

71

Current page

72

Current page

73

Current page

74

Current page

75

Current page

76

Current page

77

Current page

78

Current page

79

Current page

80

Current page

81

Current page

82

Current page

83

Current page

84

Current page

85

Current page

86

Current page

87

Current page

88

Current page

89

Current page

90

Current page

91

Current page

92

Current page

93

Current page

94

Current page

95

Current page

96

Current page

97

Current page

98

Current page

99

Current page

100

Current page

101

Current page

102

Current page

103

Current page

104

Current page

105

Current page

106

Current page

107

Current page

108

Current page

109

Current page

110

Current page

111

Current page

112

Current page

113

Current page

114

Current page

115

Current page

116

Current page

117

Current page

118

Current page

119

Current page

120

Current page

121

Current page

122

Current page

123

Current page

124

Current page

125

Current page

126

Current page

127

Current page

128

Current page

129

Current page

130

Current page

131

Current page

132

Current page

133

Current page

134

Current page

135

Current page

136

Current page

137

Current page

138

Current page

139

Current page

140

Current page

141

Current page

142

Current page

143

Current page

144

Current page

145

Current page

146

Current page

147

Current page

148

Current page

149

Current page

150

Current page

151

Current page

152

Current page

153

Current page

154

Current page

155

Current page

156

Current page

157

Current page

158

Current page

159

Current page

160

Current page

161

Current page

162

Current page

163

Current page

164

Current page

165

Current page

166

Current page

167

Current page

168

Current page

169

Current page

170

Current page

171

Current page

172

Current page

173

Current page

174

Current page

175

Current page

176

Current page

177

Current page

178

Current page

179

Current page

180

Current page

181

Current page

182

Current page

183

Current page

184

Current page

185

Current page

186

Current page

187

Current page

188

Current page

189

Current page

190

Current page

191

Current page

192

Current page

193

Current page

194

Current page

195

Current page

196

McLaren’s star car outshines its rivals

We are used to car manufacturers saving their best stuff for the Geneva show in March. They might produce concepts in Shanghai or Beijing, make important announcements in Detroit or Tokyo and, of course, the Germans will always keep something back for Frankfurt, but the greatest concentration of exotic (but real) street machines is shown in Switzerland.

This year the show found a new level, even for Geneva. Almost every sports and supercar manufacturer brought its newest and best: the Ferrari 812 Superfast, McLaren 720S, Porsche 911GT3 and Lamborghini Huracán Performante to name but four, and that’s before Bentley did that rarest things and actually managed to keep a car secret until the covers came off. The all-electric and tortuously named Bentley EXP12 Speed 6e might or might not get built but, even as an indication of current thinking in Crewe, it was great to see a low-slung, convertible sports car wearing the wings.

We even found out that Aston’s hypercar, hitherto catchily named the AM-RB 001, will be called Valkyrie, which will presumably prompt its well-heeled owners to rechristen their garages Valhalla.

If there was a star, it was the McLaren, a car fascinating for many reasons, but none more than the fact it’s the company’s first attempt to replace a pre-existing product. As reported last month, its 4-litre V8 produces 710bhp. Coupled with a 1283kg kerb weight, that provides a better power to weight ratio than some of the most coveted ultra-high performance supercars of all time, the Bugatti Veyron and McLaren F1 among them. The extra engine capacity has been achieved by using a longer stroke because its bores were already at their limit, so a few revs have been lost at the top end but with lightened internals and variable geometry turbos, McLaren’s executive director of programme development Mark Vinnels tell me the power delivery has been “utterly transformed”.

The McLaren people all seem rather more excited by the chassis modifications – not just the lighter, stiffer ‘Monocage II’ replacing the roofless ‘Monocell I’ monocoque of its 650S predecessor – but changes to both the suspension’s hardware and software. As you’d expect with a new car, all the suspension geometry, spring and damper rates are different. It has new uprights and less unsprung mass too, but Vinnels says it is the way the car’s hydraulically linked, roll bar-free suspension units keep more of the tyre in better contact with the ground for longer that has made the biggest difference. Thank a doubling of the number of suspension sensors (to 22) for that. The headlight apertures, which double as air-intakes, and a clever system for ducting the air down the sides of the cars without the need for ugly scoops, also mean it has half as much downforce again as the 650S.

So how quick is it on the track? We don’t yet know but the bald numbers – 0-60mph in 2.8sec, 0-124mph in 7.8sec and a top speed of 212mph – give a broad idea. After various off-the- record conversations, I believe its track performance is directly comparable to that of the more powerful but heavier P1 hypercar. On a long circuit doubtless the P1 would get away; on something tighter and twistier? McLaren staff then tend just to smile knowingly.

Prices for used P1s start at about £1.6 million. You can order a 720S today for £207,900.

A mid-engined 911?

It would be easy to conclude that the new Porsche 911 GT3 is effectively a production version of the massively hyped limited-edition 911R from the previous generation. Like the 911R it has a 4-litre flat six producing 493bhp and at least the option of a manual gearbox, overturning Porsche’s much-criticised move to make all its GT 911s two-pedal machines.

But it has not as simple as that. The engine may have the same capacity and output, but it has been dramatically overhauled, with new heads, a stiffer crank, liners with less friction and deleted hydraulic valve adjusters, allowing the engine to rev to the same 9000rpm as the previous 3.8-litre GT3 – the poor old 911R gave up at about 8750rpm.

Even so, you sense Porsche has spent as much time ensuring the everyday credentials of the GT3 are being maintained as its performance enhanced. Its dampers now operate over a wider range, as much to improve the ride as the handling, and inside Porsche’s new navigation and entertainment system has been fitted. There are also track apps, an increasingly obligatory feature in any car even partially intended for circuit work.

But there was far bigger news from Porsche than this. When I asked Porsche Motorsport’s manager of high performance cars Andreas Preuninger about the possibility of the mid-engine configuration now used for the RSR racing car finding its way onto the public road, he replied, “There is nothing coming soon, but in the mid-term don’t rule it out,” before adding, “I think that adding some excitement to the car in this way wouldn’t be bad.”

Porsche purists will probably foam at the mouth at the idea of a mid-engined 911, and some have already described it as a contradiction in terms, but the car exists in racing form and uses a competition version of the GT3 engine. In engineering terms, then, it would not be such a difficult job. It will probably come with the next ‘992’ generation of 911s launched in 2019, but the GT cars are always left until later to provide some mid-life spice and it would be no surprise to see the mid-engined car left longer even than that. With the engine showing 608bhp on the bench without any turbos, it might be worth the wait.

Blast from the past

Of course Geneva was not all unaffordable exotics. Land Rover launched a Porsche Macan rival called the Range Rover Velar (I have no idea what that means, either) and Volvo the conspicuously attractive XC60. But of all the cars that something close to £50,000 will buy, it was to the diminutive Alpine A110 that I was most closely drawn.

I’ll preface all that follows with the rider that the last time we got all excited about a cute, light, mid-engined, four-
cylinder, two-seat sports coupé, the car in question – the Alfa 4C – proved to be less than the sum of its interesting parts, and the same may yet be true of the Alpine.

But I found the car quite compelling. First I want to know if Renault can finally make a success of the Alpine brand: it’s a big ask, particularly as post-Brexit the car will likely cost more than £50,000 and will therefore be inevitably compared to the Porsche Cayman. The last Alpines, the A610 and GTA, were actually fine cars and excellent driving machines, but their plastic bodies and humble origins were their undoing: in a continent of badge snobs, few wanted an Alpine, least of all one built by Renault.

Even so, the new car has most of the right ingredients, including a superb 1080kg kerbweight and double unequal length wishbones at each corner. I hope Alpine makes its 250bhp, 1.8-litre four-
cylinder turbo engine sound better than Alfa’s and I lament the absence of a manual gearbox, but when you hear its engineers speak more of slip angles than lap times, you sense their priorities are correctly ordered. Modest tyre specifications and three different ESP modes back this up. I also liked the fact that all 6ft 4in of me could get in and out with ease and was comfortable on board. Quality, at least on the show car, seemed first rate too. 

Whether the Alpine will drive like its specification suggests or, even if it does, whether the public will embrace it as they failed to do its forebears, is unknown, but all Alpine can do for now is start as it means to go on. It appears to have set off at a decent rate and in the right direction.

Following PSA’s acquisition of Opel and Vauxhall, Volkswagen has refused to rule out some kind of merger with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. If that were to happen, it would create an automotive conglomerate to dwarf every other on earth. Moreover, FCA’s Sergio Marchionne was talking freely about the idea in Geneva and in warm terms. “You need to achieve scale or we will end up delivering an incredibly poor return and margins on this business.” For its part, VW says it’s had no talks with FCA but CEO Matthias Müller said of the suggested deal, “I would never exclude it.”

You may also like

Related products